THE BITCOIN SCAM
(exploringrealhistory.blogspot.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Article is complete bunk and written by someone who has no idea what Bitcoin actually is.
First, anonymizing yourself online will ALWAYS be a pain in the ass, and it will ALWAYS be more convenient not to.
Second, "Over 95% of all Bitcoins in circulation are owned by about 4% of the market. In fact, 1% of the addresses control half the entire market." Citation needed. This site debunks those claims as the biggest wallet holder has no more than 1% of all Bitcoin. https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html
This site shows the founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, holds a little over 1 million BTC, which is 1/12th of the total available supply of bitcoin (8.3%)
Winklevoss shows they own 70,000 BTC, which is less than 0.6% of the total supply of Bitcoin.
https://river.com/learn/who-owns-the-most-bitcoin/#:~:text=The%20five%20addresses%20with%20the,not%20holding%20their%20own%20keys.
Third, the decentralized nature of Bitcoin means no one can control the algorithm. It has a fixed supply that can be mined. Once it is completed, no one can artificially create more Bitcoin. Even if some rich billionaires own Bitcoin, it's fallacious to call it a scam. Would you call Gold and Silver a scam if George Soros owns $1 billion in his vault?
The entire article is bs and provides no factual arguments supporting its "scam" theory. I could dig further and waste more time, but I don't feel like wasting any more time debunking this crap article.
whats your point?
Re-read my post.
I did. What are you tryna say?
Yeah, you really should read it again. What he's trying to enlighten you on is that the article is written by someone who hasn't a clue of what they are saying and are just amplifying the usual bankster myths abut bitcoin because it is the one thing that [THEY] truly fear.
If you don't know what I'm saying then you clearly didn't read.