SCUDS are a ballistic missile. They go up, arc, come down. They dont terrain follow. A cruise missile terrain follows but didnt carry a warhead capable of the damage done that day. Not saying it wasnt a cruise missile with some kind of classified warhead.
Running on the presumption of a Cruise Missile used, could it have been used as an ignition source?
If I recall correctly it was a section recently remodeled, so what if "they" did the demolition charges (to a lesser degree) like they did with the twin towers and the Missile ignited/started the charges.
SCUDS are a ballistic missile. They go up, arc, come down. They dont terrain follow. A cruise missile terrain follows but didnt carry a warhead capable of the damage done that day. Not saying it wasnt a cruise missile with some kind of classified warhead.
Running on the presumption of a Cruise Missile used, could it have been used as an ignition source?
If I recall correctly it was a section recently remodeled, so what if "they" did the demolition charges (to a lesser degree) like they did with the twin towers and the Missile ignited/started the charges.
Pure speculative theory
I stopped in my comment from saying that too. We dont know the truth about 9-11 or TWA 800.