We know Biden has used his slurs/gaffes to send comms and this comment was also "off-script". It's perfect because the gaffe makes headlines so the comm receiver definitely gets the message and doesn't have to watch an entire talk.
Q posts 1230, 1231, 1232 https://qalerts.app/?q=%231230%7C%231231%7C%231232
12+30 = Q Post 42 https://qalerts.app/?q=%2342
Q Post 3012 https://qalerts.app/?q=%233012
Any other suggestions?
Regardless of what side is screeching, always look at personal responsibility when it comes to confirmation bias. Even though there is a narrative to mainstream media, there is also a narrative in the Q-ecosystem (the Plan, DS, etc). Both narratives deserve equal amounts of scrutiny, and you cannot ignore your own bias because you like it more.
Well I've been studying Q since November 2017 and I've been studying the deep state much longer than that. I was a big Q skeptic for awhile, but the avalanche of Q proofs became undeniable and mathematically impossible.
Many people here on this forum are well versed on comms, Q proofs...etc. So when I post a possible Q comm, I don't need to spend 60,000 words prefacing it with Q proofs, Q history, comm structure...etc.
I tried to provide you with a source to catch you up, but you chose to maintain your ignorance on the subject (i.e wordpress bad). But please go on about logical fallacies.
Confirmation bias: you focus on the Q proofs that were right and ignore all the Q proofs that never came true. That's why "no coincidences" is bullshit, because if you recognize how many Q proofs never happened, then you recognize that there definitely were coincidences.
Regardless, I don't mind waiting. If the Plan doesn't happen by the end of 2024, and Trump doesn't come back, then we will know the answer. I have no skin in the game, so I don't mind the wait, but most people here have already invested a lot of time (and money) into this.
What motive does Trump have to lead us on about Q, then? If he doesn't have control over Q, he would have disavowed Q a long time ago. That's a major liability. Trump and his hardcore followers are now considered Q adjacent. So now Q could come out with pro-Nazi shit and make Trump look like a fool.
Rather Trump is constantly fanning the flames with his choice of rally music and retruthing Q content. There's a compilation where uses "17" way more than any normal human would. He's not stupid. He knows about the Q community and what we believe. Then there's Kash Patel and Dan Scavino....pushing our Q buttons left and fucking right. They're not stupid, either.
What's the motive for them? You want to make a case? First, we need a motive.
He doesn't see it as a liability, his aides did at one point, but not him. He knows the Q-crowd are his most loyal supporters, and his "super fans," as he once said. Trump loves the people that love him, that's the gist of it. He'll wear a Q-pin, he'll retruth a Q-slogan, but he doesn't follow Q proofs in the way that you do, or anyone else here.