Once they started mentioning the “unmarked graves” in Canada, all the other information became even more suspect. The “tribunal” mentioned that supposedly “convicted” QEII and PP in the ‘60s, is about as legitimate as the thieving grifter “Queen Romana”.
Once they started mentioning the “unmarked graves” in Canada, all the other information became even more suspect. The “tribunal” mentioned that supposedly “convicted” QEII and PP in the ‘60s, is about as legitimate as the thieving grifter “Queen Romana”.
Sorry, too much that isn’t true, here.