The summary works hard to discredit the movie: "pseudoscience propaganda" (not merely "propaganda" adds the extra "pseudoscience" just in case you missed it), "alleging" (OK, fair - the only one you need) "purports, "purported", "discredited", "derided", and a several ad hominem attacks on Wakefield, "discredited", "anti-vaccine", "fraudulent research", etc.
Similar verbiage could have been applied to "An Inconvenient Truth"
Disclosure: I haven't seen the movie, but I would rather form my own opinion rather than have some hack reviewer try to poison the well.
Those weasel words are usually what sticks out to me when reading things like this. The bias of the writers, on full display trying to lead the reader to a conclusion instead of letting the information stand on its own. Very sad.
Back when I was in school(90s) we had a "media literacy" segment where we all had to read various articles, clippings, etc and from the wording of them we had to figure out the bias and leading phrases that would indicate what the writer was trying to make you think.
They had a Youtube channel with hundreds of interviews with parents of vaccine-damaged children, including some of whom died within 24 hours of getting vaccinated. After COVID started the whole channel was deleted for "misinformation".
The summary works hard to discredit the movie: "pseudoscience propaganda" (not merely "propaganda" adds the extra "pseudoscience" just in case you missed it), "alleging" (OK, fair - the only one you need) "purports, "purported", "discredited", "derided", and a several ad hominem attacks on Wakefield, "discredited", "anti-vaccine", "fraudulent research", etc.
Similar verbiage could have been applied to "An Inconvenient Truth"
Disclosure: I haven't seen the movie, but I would rather form my own opinion rather than have some hack reviewer try to poison the well.
Those weasel words are usually what sticks out to me when reading things like this. The bias of the writers, on full display trying to lead the reader to a conclusion instead of letting the information stand on its own. Very sad.
Back when I was in school(90s) we had a "media literacy" segment where we all had to read various articles, clippings, etc and from the wording of them we had to figure out the bias and leading phrases that would indicate what the writer was trying to make you think.
I don't think that happens anymore.
That’s the msm in a nutshell. They don’t serve to inform, their job is to spin the stories and maintain a narrative.
I watched it on Bitchute along with Vaxxed 2. After watching the second one, my wife was finally convinced to not vaccinate our newborn
Ptl 🙏
There's such great content on Bitchute, but I can never get them to spit out anything in high definition. I can't find a setting to change that?
Vaxxed II is also on Children's Health Defense dot org. They have it in HD at 720p. I haven't seen it yet but I'm hoping to make time this weekend. https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/education/vaxxed2
Absolutely! Awesome that you have brought it to light! Thank you!
https://odysee.com/@freefromcensorship:7/vaxxed:6b
https://odysee.com/@DotConnectorReports:e/VAXXED-(FULL-DOCUMENTARY):c
Authors names…
They had a Youtube channel with hundreds of interviews with parents of vaccine-damaged children, including some of whom died within 24 hours of getting vaccinated. After COVID started the whole channel was deleted for "misinformation".