Searching for those numbers brings me this: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2047-53&version=NIV
Isaiah Chapters 47-53
Does the Lord's message not resonate with us right now? Praise the Lord!
Searching for those numbers brings me this: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2047-53&version=NIV
Isaiah Chapters 47-53
Does the Lord's message not resonate with us right now? Praise the Lord!
I've always wondered if the drops were also training us to interpret the Bible.
Good grief. They aren't.
A proper hermeneutic needs only grammatical and historical context.
With those two things, you will understand biblical passages.
(no drops necessary)
For your proper hermeneutic, drops are not necessary.
How do you get people that aren't into politics, interested politically?
Can this same vehicle be used to bring people back to Christ?
Whether you like it or not, surely you have to admit the Q plan is already in motion. While the grammatical and historical context was good enough to ignite our fire for knowledge, others need something closer to home.
Hermeneutics is the proper way to interpret scripture and it doesn't include drops (just grammatical and historical context).
The Gospel is the vehicle to bring people to Christ.
Nobody even knows what the Q plan is. It, as stated, includes that disinformation is necessary, so good luck. Folks have thrown their best decodes/guesses at it for the last 4 years and have gotten it absolutely wrong...not even close.
You appear to be talking two different things: Interpretation of the Bible is one thing (and can only properly be done with a grammatical, historical context); the drawing of those to Christ, which is another.
Yes, this is what I was talking about in the first place.
Now you're forgetting the other angle - The Q plan using scripture as a code to send a message.
Pompeo used scripture to lead us to Q posts, so why would it be farfetched for us to use Q posts to lead back to scripture?