Good article. But, notice how everyone, and I mean everyone completely ignores the perpetual prime suspect of global terrorism- the radical jihad faction.
I wonder why? Do none of our "brilliant" geopolitical analysts really think that it is so far out of the realm of possibility that radical jihadi factions could be behind the destruction of NS1,2 that they all refuse to even mention jihadists as a possible suspect? Weird huh?
Good article. But, notice how everyone, and I mean everyone completely ignores the perpetual prime suspect of global terrorism- the radical jihad faction.
I wonder why? Do none of our "brilliant" geopolitical analysts really think that it is so far out of the realm of possibility that radical jihadi factions could be behind the destruction of NS1,2 that they all refuse to even mention jihadists as a possible suspect? Weird huh?