Warning:The title is not accurate and highly misleading
I went ahead and did the legwork to find the source and find the historical documents from that time in order to understand the true intent and not someone from today's interpretation.
The event took place on "Jewish day" was said to show the struggles of humans and how they eventually came to believe in a single God instead of paganism.
The production was created by Jews and Christians.
This production intended to show how the early Gods were blind forces of evil.
The production was intended to raise awareness and to raise money for the German-Jews to relocate to Palestine
The child sacrifice scene actually is depicting pagans, with the Hebrew prophets protesting. It shows early days of Abraham and how early Jews protested against the pagan human sacrifices.
So, I do over two hours of searching, finding the references, digging up historical documents from the time it was created to get a true understanding of the event in question, and because it's not what you were hoping for I am a shill. You sound exactly like a libtard who calls people nazi and racist when they hear things they don't like,
you just sound like someone saying the gottard tunnel ritual wasn't aaaaackshally a ritual, and then citing a bunch of MSM garbage that 'says here it clearly wasn't a ritual'.
This was a historical document from the time of the event.
Was there a real ritual happening? - who knows. but what I do know was that at the time of the event they were marketing it as a show to celebrate how we went away from paganism. I can only go by what can be researched, outside of that its just conjecture.
You have a lot of comments up in this thread hammering on the same point over and over again as if we couldn't read ONE comment, so you had to make five more saying the same thing. That counts as screeching.
I responded to other people's comments since many don't revisit the page if they are not responded to.
So I think that makes it so smol pede just sounds like he's making a cutting joke, which I laughed at because it was funny. And yours sounds more like reeeeee'ing. At least to me anyway.
That's fine, I only ask for people to not spread mis/disinformation and if that makes me a "reeeee-er" so be it. This is the battle that I have chosen to take up, the battle to reduce the proliferation of disinformation which often gets me into arguments since some on here think that you should only be skeptical in one direction and if I am skeptical when it comes to this stuff, I am somehow an FBI CIA Glowie shill. (but wouldn't a shill want to keep the proliferation of disinformation alive?)
You have discovered that nothing brings downvotes faster than ruining a potential hatefest with facts. It's depressing to see otherwise usually sensible people determined to prop up slurs, but keep up the research.
This accords with my own search. One has to dig deeper to find the truth of matters. Taking things out of context is a leftist trick, we should not be engaging in such stupid tactics.
If you want to dig deeper, then according to the Talmud (a jewish scripture), it's permissible for jews to give their children to molech as long as the child isn't passed through the the fire.
(You'll have to scroll down a bit. Or press Ctrl+F and search for the term "offspring".)
It's like they saw the verse that said "You are not to sacrifice any of your children in the fire to Molech" (Leviticus 18:21).... and found a loophole -- "hmmm. it should be okay to sacrifice kids to molech as long as they're not passed through the fire".
Warning: The title is not accurate and highly misleading
I went ahead and did the legwork to find the source and find the historical documents from that time in order to understand the true intent and not someone from today's interpretation.
Thanks for your “warning”, shill. Straight from the (((Chicago Tribune))).
So, I do over two hours of searching, finding the references, digging up historical documents from the time it was created to get a true understanding of the event in question, and because it's not what you were hoping for I am a shill. You sound exactly like a libtard who calls people nazi and racist when they hear things they don't like,
You have discovered that nothing brings downvotes faster than ruining a potential hatefest with facts. It's depressing to see otherwise usually sensible people determined to prop up slurs, but keep up the research.
This accords with my own search. One has to dig deeper to find the truth of matters. Taking things out of context is a leftist trick, we should not be engaging in such stupid tactics.
If you want to dig deeper, then according to the Talmud (a jewish scripture), it's permissible for jews to give their children to molech as long as the child isn't passed through the the fire.
See here -- https://media.communities.win/post/sGIpgcpO.png
You can double check at this online Talmud -- https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.64a
(You'll have to scroll down a bit. Or press Ctrl+F and search for the term "offspring".)
It's like they saw the verse that said "You are not to sacrifice any of your children in the fire to Molech" (Leviticus 18:21).... and found a loophole -- "hmmm. it should be okay to sacrifice kids to molech as long as they're not passed through the fire".
agreed