TLDR: She believes this is a political stunt. Float the idea of charges prior to the midterms to make DOJ look less biased, then either low-ball the charges, plea bargain the whole thing away, or don't charge at all after the midterms are over.
Does it really hurt the DNC if they announce prior to the election he isn't being changed? The Republicans and free thinking independents are probably already about as engaged, enraged, and riled up about the last election and current state of things that I don't see Hunter's misdeeds being ignored as being any large trigger for more people.
An intelligent take on the subject from Lara Logan via Newsmax: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqXhOkdWI-I
TLDR: She believes this is a political stunt. Float the idea of charges prior to the midterms to make DOJ look less biased, then either low-ball the charges, plea bargain the whole thing away, or don't charge at all after the midterms are over.
Not saying that’s wrong…. But logic doesn’t follow
They’ve swept Hunter under the rug (successfully) thus far. Willingly bringing it up before midterms hurts the DNC in the short and long term.
But then again, Q repeatedly said “these people are stupid.”
Does it really hurt the DNC if they announce prior to the election he isn't being changed? The Republicans and free thinking independents are probably already about as engaged, enraged, and riled up about the last election and current state of things that I don't see Hunter's misdeeds being ignored as being any large trigger for more people.