Robert Gouveia

on Rumble or YouTube

RH is the only one who REGULARLY pays for the transcripts and goes through them bit by bit. Lawyer IRL which is helpful for explaining legal system.

--

Viva & Barnes

also on Rumble

V&B usually don't go through the filings OR the transcripts (they do sometimes) BUT their expertise as as actual lawyers themselves who've worked on similar cases makes their analysis VERY unbiased - they're excellent at telling you how things are proceeding, how normal they are or aren't, if the law is being followed in their opinion, and they are very good at AVOIDING HYPE or hopium which makes them pretty unique.

--

Just Human

on Rumble or Substack

JH is good too - he usually just downloads the filings w/o transcripts (transcripts are expensive!) and I wouldn't call him unbiased at all - though he is very good! and will show you the case through the Q lens which the 1st two suggestions won't.

--

Brian Cates

on Rumble or Twitch

Probably the most biased. I'm only including him because he's mentioned alot in this thread and he IS very informed - but he tends to look at events through a lens of already having an idea about what it means - he's often right! - but since you asked for unbiased coverage I thought I'd include a warning. Don't count him out though!

--

edit: looks like @realtoriabrooke on TS is providing up-to-date almost real time reporting on the Danchenko case as well ! We have THE BEST journalism!

I enjoy having both an outsider and an insider perspective!

Everyone HAS some kind of bias and 80% of people I meet are in complete denial of what their bias is or rarely they DO know but severely underestimate it's effect on their analysis or conclusions.

Best to not try and avoid others bias - it can't be done.

Instead try to incorporate a wide variety of DIFFERENT biases compare their strategies of thinking and ultimately their conclusions.

Then think for yourself!

Cheers -

WWG1WGA