https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03206-5
Sorry in advance, I know it's dumb and it's a blip on the bullshit gaslight bait radar, but does anyone make anything of this?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
The title is a pun on a well-known book series, referenced in the bottom of the article by the writer.
As for dark matter, my 2c on the notion is that its an empirical fit to try and explain any discrepancies between what the universe-expansion type equations predict, and what is being observed more directly, in as much as one can observe things so far away and hence so long ago that we can only try and extrapolate to what is really there in that volume of space at the current time.
https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/hubble-constant-explained
Doesn't seem to touch on too many satanic themes, and to my way of thinking the article was seemingly written by a person with no grasp of the physics or whats happening at CERN at all.
Good catch, it's a literary nod. The draconic secrecy language of the thing, and CERN, made it a blip on my witchcraft radar.
The author does have a whimsical flowery booknerd hippy girl tone more so than a sinister methodical agent of the deep state or a degenerate cultist, or a scientist for that matter. Weird niche writing fangirl pseudo poetry about CERN.
Interesting to see the different angles of perspective people see shit from though. I tend to look for comms but I don't think this is comms, still, I will look up that book tomorrow and surface source the authorships here. Thanks.
That's a good characterization as to the tone of the article, light and bohemian. Interestingly, the authors name being a clickable object pops up that she actually has a masters in astrophysics.
Maybe thats why she got the nod to write the piece, but its somewhat odd that she didn't draw on the expertise that I presume she has, and that the intended audience of folks who might read Nature could relate to.