25
posted ago by sleepydude ago by sleepydude +25 / -0

I got to be honest, I'm not really invested in either side of the debate on her allegiances.

Ultimately, these figures are distractions and will fade as quickly as they come about.

Remember what happened to Lin Wood?

Once upon a time everyone was posting his hot takes, linking to his telegram, etc.

Then there was a whole beef with Flynn.

Now... crickets...

This is my opinion on Tulsi Gabbard: she's just like every other politician.

Remember this single fact when considering allegiances...

You don't play the game without getting dirty.

Every politician is guilty of working for the Cabal by default. Only outsiders should be viewed with any modicum of loyalty to the Constitution, and only after they've proven themselves by being rejected by 99% of the System, including the full force of the Main Stream Media Beast.

Even then, skepticism is appropriate. Once you begin to "trust" someone above and beyond reason, that's when they are most likely to stab you in the back.

Everything is a scheme, a plan, a rig, and optics. Tulsi was comfortable where she was. What does she have to gain by making this play? That's the question you should be asking right now, with the highest degree of cynicism.

How does leaving the DNC benefit her?

She knew the MSM would attack and smear her, it's the obvious result. What suddenly made that bad publicity worth it?

Why are they pushing her defection?

What would the Cabal have to gain by smearing her and emphasizing her association with the WEF?

These questions need answers before anyone should take a side for or against Tulsi Gabbard.

As it stands, I'll retain my default position in that she's just dirty as the rest of them.

I hope this rambling helps in your discernment of the situation.