unless Mel actually saw something or experienced it firsthand, his testimony is hearsay.
My prediction: " OBJECTION OBJECTION OBJECTION OBJECTION " " we have no further questions "
cross examination: " Mister Gibson you are a well known anti-semite, your attempt to testify your hearsay today in court is obviously an anti-semitic attack against my jewish client "
I hope it goes differently but i know the defense has this line lock and loaded.
I don't think they will behave themselves, but we'll see. also doesn't rebut the hearsay objection fiasco. Nothing he says about the event will be useable, only his own observations of people allegedly involved if he was not involved in any harassment event himself. It'll be interesting to see for sure.
unless Mel actually saw something or experienced it firsthand, his testimony is hearsay.
My prediction: " OBJECTION OBJECTION OBJECTION OBJECTION " " we have no further questions "
cross examination: " Mister Gibson you are a well known anti-semite, your attempt to testify your hearsay today in court is obviously an anti-semitic attack against my jewish client "
I hope it goes differently but i know the defense has this line lock and loaded.
But at least he can corroborate that she hasn't just recently made it up since he was aware back at the time that "something" had happened.
for sure, good point
Correct...👌
I don't think they will behave themselves, but we'll see. also doesn't rebut the hearsay objection fiasco. Nothing he says about the event will be useable, only his own observations of people allegedly involved if he was not involved in any harassment event himself. It'll be interesting to see for sure.