When did the anons stop counting? Did you miss something? 🤔
(media.greatawakening.win)
👨💻 Shall we play a game? 🙂
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
So much of this stuff is pure conjecture, but I'll toss an idea out.
There's a focus on syllables, so I start there:
7, 7, 6, 5, 6, 10, 9 for each line, respectively
Line 1 is missing a syllable. Line 7 has an extra.
Add and reduce? 7 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 6 + 10 + 9 = 50; 5 + 0 = 5
Ok, if 5 is the key, go back and look at the line with 5 syllables. Poisoned frogs? Is the idea that Telegram is poisoning the frogs with frogs referring to anons using the platform? If so, how? It can't be content alone. It has to be a function of the platform. Telegram collects IP and a phone number to register an account. You also have to give it significant permissions to access files and smartphone functions for it to work properly. If it's collecting more than it advertises, and that info that could be seen as poisoning.
A quick excerpt from the Wiki (I know, not a source, but it's cited within to courses like the Financial Times and TechCrunch. Use your discernment.)
So, we've got Russian developers who have a pattern of getting their products captured by Russian FSB and compromised. And we have a chain of really shady shell corporations to hide who owns them and where they operate. If this organization is operating like FB and spying on everything you do on your phone and hijacking your microphone as well, it could be a particularly poisonous frog.
Anyway, that's my guess and the path I took. I'll look forward to seeing the correct answer later!
So we are all supposed to leave Tele ... crap.
I'm not going until after the election. Sorry anons, but I think you got this one wonky. Maybe not wrong...but wonky.