Most likely explanation is that he's a guy whose interests do not align with ours and he's working in no way to benefit us, but instead to empower himself and his loyalists, who are probably not good guys at all.
It's possible that there's something more positive, but if you look all through history and the motivations of people in power throughout all time and institutions, the above is way more of a likely scenario.
China's leadership benefits from not throwing off the chains that shackle our citizens or theirs. That's the reality. There is a possibility for alternate motivations, and hopefully they come to pass, but until there's real evidence I would err on the side of probability.
Most likely explanation is that he's a guy whose interests do not align with ours and he's working in no way to benefit us, but instead to empower himself and his loyalists, who are probably not good guys at all.
It's possible that there's something more positive, but if you look all through history and the motivations of people in power throughout all time and institutions, the above is way more of a likely scenario.
China's leadership benefits from not throwing off the chains that shackle our citizens or theirs. That's the reality. There is a possibility for alternate motivations, and hopefully they come to pass, but until there's real evidence I would err on the side of probability.