Or they could deploy missiles that would explode in a spectacular but harmless fireworks display simultaneously over London, Berlin, New York, and Los Angeles, to show that there really wouldn't be breathing space for a response after the first strike.
That's what everyone thinks: "Yeah, they'll throw a nuke at us, and then we'll wipe them out, so even if we lose a city, we win." This is unrealistic. They would do the nuke firestorm with their hypersonic missles and wipe us out in the first round. Maybe we have the same capability, but it seems like policy dunces don't know or are not doing the math. That's why I suggested multiple simultaneous fireworks in their exercises as a graphic illustration. Add one over Diego Garcia and Africa.
Or they could deploy missiles that would explode in a spectacular but harmless fireworks display simultaneously over London, Berlin, New York, and Los Angeles, to show that there really wouldn't be breathing space for a response after the first strike.
The minute they launch at us we would launch .. no?
That's what everyone thinks: "Yeah, they'll throw a nuke at us, and then we'll wipe them out, so even if we lose a city, we win." This is unrealistic. They would do the nuke firestorm with their hypersonic missles and wipe us out in the first round. Maybe we have the same capability, but it seems like policy dunces don't know or are not doing the math. That's why I suggested multiple simultaneous fireworks in their exercises as a graphic illustration. Add one over Diego Garcia and Africa.
Proposed real tsunami with radioactivity, from submarine vs. airstrike:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/14558205/russian-radioactive-tsunami-torepdo-poseidon-2m39/