That is one of the odd contradictions among the woke. Pretending to be black for entertainment: Terrible! Pretending to be a woman for entertainment: Wonderful!
Then there’s the contradiction of “I’m against gender norms, but I’m going to dress like a caricature of a 1950s Broadway dancer to show how female I am."
FTA: "But to mount an effective opposition, one must first understand the sexual politics behind the glitter, sequins, and heels. This requires a working knowledge of an extensive history, from the origin of the first “queen of drag” in the late nineteenth century to the development of academic queer theory, which provides the intellectual foundation for the modern drag-for-kids movement."
No it doesn't. It just requires honoring your inner sense of right and wrong. And if you need to back that up, common sense comes in handy.
If you're into sociology and psychology, it's a good article detailing how degradation is justified. Hopefully it's useful for those in the trenches, or those who need to haul a naive family member away from the danger of groomers.
I think it does. Having an inner sense of right and wrong is great, but it's not a convincing argument in the political arena. When pro-trans people say "Just let people be who they are," saying "That feels wrong to me" is not a very convincing response. But saying: "Drag kids and transgenderism in schools is part of an explicit plan to destroy the gender binary, the traditional family, and essentially the basis of Western civilization, and here are the advocates saying exactly that" is a much stronger argument.
I'm pretty aware of the history of eugenics, but even though trans hormones/surgery effectively neuter people, I don't see that as coming from a eugenics perspective. In other words, I don't see any eugenics types advocating trans stuff on eugenics principles. And I still don't see the Pilgrim Society connection.
I fail to see the difference between mocking women and performing in blackface. Double standards anyone?
That is one of the odd contradictions among the woke. Pretending to be black for entertainment: Terrible! Pretending to be a woman for entertainment: Wonderful!
Then there’s the contradiction of “I’m against gender norms, but I’m going to dress like a caricature of a 1950s Broadway dancer to show how female I am."
The little ‘cottage industry’ they are trying to establish and take mainstream is slowly being exposed.
FTA: "But to mount an effective opposition, one must first understand the sexual politics behind the glitter, sequins, and heels. This requires a working knowledge of an extensive history, from the origin of the first “queen of drag” in the late nineteenth century to the development of academic queer theory, which provides the intellectual foundation for the modern drag-for-kids movement."
No it doesn't. It just requires honoring your inner sense of right and wrong. And if you need to back that up, common sense comes in handy.
If you're into sociology and psychology, it's a good article detailing how degradation is justified. Hopefully it's useful for those in the trenches, or those who need to haul a naive family member away from the danger of groomers.
I think it does. Having an inner sense of right and wrong is great, but it's not a convincing argument in the political arena. When pro-trans people say "Just let people be who they are," saying "That feels wrong to me" is not a very convincing response. But saying: "Drag kids and transgenderism in schools is part of an explicit plan to destroy the gender binary, the traditional family, and essentially the basis of Western civilization, and here are the advocates saying exactly that" is a much stronger argument.
Fair enough.
someone is bending over backwards not to blame eughenicists and pilgrim society
I've never seen a connection between those topics and drag/transgenderism. Please explain and include links if you've got 'em.
you see NO connection between eugenics and drags not reproducing aspart of their agenda????
multilation of sexual organs is a one way street to no children but ok
look into american intelligence media and they will connect the pilgrims solciety for you
I'm pretty aware of the history of eugenics, but even though trans hormones/surgery effectively neuter people, I don't see that as coming from a eugenics perspective. In other words, I don't see any eugenics types advocating trans stuff on eugenics principles. And I still don't see the Pilgrim Society connection.
well spend about three weeksover at american intelligence media and thenget back to me stop being lazy and do some research