Neither version of this article mentioned the key reason why nuclear victory is exceedingly dangerous even under the most favorable conditions, which reason is the concept (and the likely reality in the event of nuclear war between the two superpowers) “nuclear winter” — the scientific studies showing that a resulting sudden sharp cooling of the atmosphere after all those enormous explosions would produce a global die-off. America’s aristocracy and its vassal-aristocracies controlling the U.S.-allied nations (billionaires, centi-millionaires, and their top agents in both the public and private sectors) are buying and building deep-underground nuclear shelters for themselves, but they wouldn’t be able to stay underground and survive on stored feedstuffs forever. (As for everybody else, those other people are not involved in geostrategic decision making, and so are being ignored.) However, many of America’s (and associated) elite are paying those bomb-shelter expenses, but none of the West’s elite are condemning the path toward nuclear war that their governments are on. So: buying or building nuclear-war shelters is more acceptable to them than is stopping America’s planned conquest of Russia. The higher priority is to conquer Russia.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
I wonder, the land Gates and China are buying up, are they strategically placed to suffer the least effects of any nuke?
Laws can be made to force selling of the land bought by foreigners and may be confiscated from evil persons like Bill and Melinda Gates. Where is the media’s interest in what Melinda is up to? Watch the wives-look here and not there. Just because they are supposedly divorced doesn’t mean anything. Also look into what the Gates children are doing, because “birds of a feather, flock together.” Look at what Soros’s children are involved in just as an example.