Since when are we commanded by moderators to accept non-anons word as fact unless we can do an in-depth study of their current content?
Challenge accepted, I guess.
At 1:14 Juan makes a statement of fact, Trump can now be prosecuted because of paperwork he personally saw was "signed".
I'm sorry, but statements of fact like this with zero sauce are not valid. It's a major "trust me bro" statement that could have been elaborated on for so much more ...
What kind of document, filed where? Some Judge? What court or jurisdiction?
How does he have access to such a type of document?
Does he believe this because he saw it himself, or did someone tell him about it?
What is the agenda of the person who told them this?
Don't know. Sauce not provided.
If the answers to the above questions are "sorry that info is too secret and would get people in trouble", then he shouldn't have been stating it in the first place.
At 5:35 Juan states that FBI coordinated with Trump two weeks prior to him being raided, that Trump brought them in and showed them how everything was being stored at Mar a Lago.
What a major "trust me bro" statement of fact. Literally no one else I'm aware of has made such a statement? What is Juan's connection to Trump in that he's the only one in the world who was privy to such information?
How convenient for Juan that every statement of fact he makes is completely non-verifiable.
And here is where the danger comes in.
People who love Juan simply assume he's part of the Q team, because that's the only way he could know these things is if he has insider access. They assume he's the voice of Q because he's an insider and he's somehow been given permission to spill the beans on all this super-insider stuff.
People are well within their full rights to call Juan a larp, based on the above alone.
Now, why are mods stickying non-anons and demanding that we listen to them before we can criticize them? I already knew Juan makes wild statements of fact that are non-verifiable (by design). Why did I have to completely set aside all my prior well-informed opinion about Juan and listen to his current drivel in order to respond to him?
The Q movement is about information, not celebrity. Demanding we accept the word of a celebrity is the antithesis to the anon movement.
How about anyone (Mods AND general Juan Supporters) posting his drivel be required to post sauce supporting the said content?
The problem is there would be no Juan posts.
Thinking strategically, IF in fact Juan has insider info…and IF he is on the Q team (or has ties to it) and he is out here telling us Patriots and any normie who’ll listen how the hotdogs are being made THEN that’s just a dumb plan.
Why on earth would you alert the enemy to your weaknesses and vulnerabilities?
And if he’s “leaking” this “real world info I know cuz I’m an insider bro” then he is in fact a traitor to the cause….and remind me never to include Juan in a bank robbing heist cuz he’d get us all caught.
Since when are we commanded by moderators to accept non-anons word as fact unless we can do an in-depth study of their current content?
Challenge accepted, I guess.
At 1:14 Juan makes a statement of fact, Trump can now be prosecuted because of paperwork he personally saw was "signed".
I'm sorry, but statements of fact like this with zero sauce are not valid. It's a major "trust me bro" statement that could have been elaborated on for so much more ...
Don't know. Sauce not provided.
If the answers to the above questions are "sorry that info is too secret and would get people in trouble", then he shouldn't have been stating it in the first place.
At 5:35 Juan states that FBI coordinated with Trump two weeks prior to him being raided, that Trump brought them in and showed them how everything was being stored at Mar a Lago.
What a major "trust me bro" statement of fact. Literally no one else I'm aware of has made such a statement? What is Juan's connection to Trump in that he's the only one in the world who was privy to such information?
How convenient for Juan that every statement of fact he makes is completely non-verifiable.
And here is where the danger comes in.
People who love Juan simply assume he's part of the Q team, because that's the only way he could know these things is if he has insider access. They assume he's the voice of Q because he's an insider and he's somehow been given permission to spill the beans on all this super-insider stuff.
People are well within their full rights to call Juan a larp, based on the above alone.
Now, why are mods stickying non-anons and demanding that we listen to them before we can criticize them? I already knew Juan makes wild statements of fact that are non-verifiable (by design). Why did I have to completely set aside all my prior well-informed opinion about Juan and listen to his current drivel in order to respond to him?
The Q movement is about information, not celebrity. Demanding we accept the word of a celebrity is the antithesis to the anon movement.
Uh oh, Critical Thinking in the House!
EVERYTHING Juan says is sauceless.
How about a reverse challenge???
How about anyone (Mods AND general Juan Supporters) posting his drivel be required to post sauce supporting the said content?
The problem is there would be no Juan posts.
Thinking strategically, IF in fact Juan has insider info…and IF he is on the Q team (or has ties to it) and he is out here telling us Patriots and any normie who’ll listen how the hotdogs are being made THEN that’s just a dumb plan.
Why on earth would you alert the enemy to your weaknesses and vulnerabilities?
And if he’s “leaking” this “real world info I know cuz I’m an insider bro” then he is in fact a traitor to the cause….and remind me never to include Juan in a bank robbing heist cuz he’d get us all caught.
Anyway, just my two shekels.
Magavoices, You earned my Updoot Fren!