Name doesn't check out.
Why do people think that’s OK?
Prosecutors cut deals in regular every-day America, deals obtained through leverage of the crime committed, all day long every day of the week.
Bad guys are turned into informants (having their bad deeds leveraged against them) in regular every-day America all day long, every day of the week.
Judges cut people slack after having evaluated their extenuating circumstances (cooperation obtained through leverage of crimes committed) in regular every-day America, all day long every day of the week.
But Trump does it and you clutch your pearls?
They catch some low level drug dealer and, instead of utilizing his testimony to catch those above him -- you're only interested in him being publicly humiliated and not interested in providing incentive for him to cooperate?
They tell McCain -- admit for posterity on video the things you have done, provide testimony about your handlers and you get to die with a level of dignity as we execute you -- not justice in your eyes? Not without the public humiliation aspect? Executed isn't good enough for you ... has to be executed + humiliated or it doesn't count?
Are the prosecutors and judges also just as bad as the perpetrators? If you think using evil deeds as leverage makes the person leveraging just as bad as the perpetrators -- you have a warped sense of right and wrong.
Where's the "every. single. time." peanut gallery?
I'm waiting for their unhinged "Jews told the Muslims to do it" hot take.
Arresting them and shipping them back home is free education.
Did Anons Forget
To be fair, the group that put all their eggs in the Axios basket are bots, not anons.
Missed opportunity to put the X over her face.
What's going to happen is word will spread to the brokers that their deliveries are going to be held up and they're going to eat the loss on the delayed shipment, the towing, the storage of the vehicle until another driver can show up ...
Once this happens a few times, they'll see it as a liability and stop hiring illegals, at least ones that can't read.
If no client list is ever released, will you apologize?
The whole premise of Q is that there is a plan. Q told you and everyone else about Epstein before he was on anyone's radar.
That's your clue in neon flashing lights. If you can't see it, why in the hell are you on a Q board? Just fuck off already.
There's a massive crowd of people who don't believe Q is a thing -- go there where they hang out and post with them.
There's a ton of potential explanations.
-
Trump could be creating distance between himself and inevitable prosecutions so that it doesn't appear he's targeting political rivals.
-
Trump could be making it appear (with Elon's help) that he's on the list and thus create a demand on part of the democrats to see the list.
-
It could be a reverse psychology gimmick, where Trump says he wants to move on from talking about Epstein and thus all the MSM focuses on extending discussion about it.
-
It could be that Trump is inviting the MSM to mock him in regards to the Epstein files in order to bring the discussion to the forefront in arenas it would never be discussed.
-
It could be that Trump wants the guilty parties to feel at ease, which gives them more rope to hang themselves and prevents them from covering their tracks or enacting counter-measures.
-
It could be that Trump is baiting supposed allies into revealing themselves as traitors.
-
Optics are everything, if the Epstein files are followed up on because of democrats demanding that it be so, it opens a large amount of American citizens to have their eyes opened who would never consider it real if Trump spearheaded its release.
We all owe Trump a mountain of deference. We owe Trump the benefit of the doubt. Anyone who would throw Trump under the bus because of that ridiculous Axios memo were already against Trump. You look at the post history of all these accounts and they are super sus. They're here with an agenda to consensus crack and spread FUD.
I demand an apology from all the blackpill doomtards in this thread https://greatawakening.win/p/19BZpfVCtv/breaking-doj-and-fbi-have-conclu/
As well as all the DARPA AI bots who hadn't posted in 6+ months but were dusted off to enhance the psyop.
/u/TrueFlagPatriot420 u/LockedandLoaded
As well as the dual-psyop bots that not only threw Trump under the bus over the Axios memo, but also aren't afraid to have 90% of their comments deleted for hating Jews.
/u/KeeperOfTheGlizzy u/Condor819
And a special shout out to all the glowie glow fags whose recommended course of action was to grab your guns and storm Trump's whitehouse.
If you were crying because the sky was falling and I didn't give you a personal shout-out -- you're probably a DARPA AI bot so I'm sure you don't care.
There are too many anti-Q accounts with free reign on GAW right now, virtue signaling how many blackpills they can swallow at once.
It's a heavy-handed and obvious psyop.
The natural thing to do, if you don't believe Q has it all, is to shut the eff up and stop frequenting a board committed to following Q. You don't see me hunting down wherever the flat earther fags like to post and going out of my way to convince them of the folly of their ways -- why? Because I don't give a shit about their delusion.
If you insist I'm deluded for following Q, what do you get out of proselytizing me otherwise? Because you think I'm being lulled to sleep so I won't join you in arms as you rebel against the Trump administration? Glowie glowfags are glowing.
Anyone who believes the Axios memo is real is gullible.
I challenge anyone to find an actual FBI memo that doesn't have a date.
That doesn't have the name of the author.
That doesn't have the name of the intended recipient/audience.
That doesn't have classified status.
Go to google image search, do a search for "FBI memorandum", look at the format they all have. Ask yourself why the Axios one is so different.
Trump and Q pointed out Epstein before he was on anyone's radar. A big fat zero people talked about Epstein prior to Q.
It's like you're walking through the desert, about to die of thirst, Trump tells you where a water fountain is and you walk up to it -- then believe a conspiracy about how Trump is supposedly concealing all the water.
the only way out for us is to do it ourselves (if you catch my meaning)
Yes, everyone caught that meaning. It's glowie talk for "hey everyone, let's grab our guns and go storm the castle". Whose castle? Trump is the POTUS. You're stating that we should pick up firearms and attack Trump's administration ...
Ridiculous.
The sheer number of sleeper accounts who had posted absolutely nothing in the last 6 months and then crawled out of the woodwork to shit all over Trump and declare Q a fraud was mind boggling.
Obvious psyop is obvious.
Trump and Q told you about Epstein before he was ever on your radar. Q+ spent the last 8+ years giving proofs beyond a shadow of doubt -- and now some libtard rag publishes unsourced claims and everyone is losing their mind.
The sheer coordination of accounts who haven't posted anything in the last 6 months and then came crawling out of the woodwork to respond to this thread is mind boggling.
If this article concerns you, then I'm just going to outright say it -- you're gullible. Did you even read the article with an ounce of skepticism?
The article isn't credible. Read it, looking for sauce that confirms the premise of Epstein not having a list -- there is none.
They quote Bongino and Patel -- but not in relation to the premise of Epstein not having a list, they were talking about the suicide.
The premise boils down to an unsourced memo with no proof, confirmations or other sauce referenced. If you've read that article, and researched the bias of Axios, and still concerned about Trump -- you're one of two things.
- Completely gullible
or
- You hate Trump and Q and were itching for an opportunity to dust off your unused GAW accounts to consensus crack that this was the straw that broke your back (yet when reading your comment history its revealed your back has been broken for quite some time).
If q is fake, then the whole elite pedo-vore cabal isn't real
The podesta emails were released October 2016, the first Q drop was October 2017.
Pizzagate, the notion that elites are trafficking children, the sick James Alefantis media profiles showing kids tied up, etc. ... predates Q.
But I don't think we want South Africa.
Large pool of blacks who are ok with chanting death to whites ... no thanks.
We'll take the farmers.
hmm, not sure if I like it
Trump decided to go with the republican party and take it over, rather than risk going 3rd party and SEVERELY diluting potential votes.
The only thing wrong with the republican party are the RINOs, which as the name implies, they aren't really republicans to begin with.
Yeah, that was kind of my point but I probably made it badly.
My point was that Jew haters intermingle with us, trying to pretend they have anything at all as a shared interest -- when they clearly don't.
They absolutely hate Q+, even when Trump does things that should coincide with their world view (like calling out bankers who inflict usury). They completely forget they hate Trump for about 2 moments and then they default back to hating Trump.
Because deep down they have far more in common with radical leftists, or (more likely) are a psyop perpetrated by the same people pushing radical leftism.
Congress makes their pennies with salaries.
They make their billions with USAID-kickbacks and insider information.
shylock (/ˈʃaɪlɒk/ SHY-lok)
Verb (uncapitalized):
To lend money at extortionate rates of interest: This describes the action of lending money with the intention of profiting unfairly from the borrower's inability to repay.
Jew haters have it both ways. On one hand, they absolutely insist that Trump is a puppet of Israel -- on the other, any remark Trump makes that can be construed as anti-Jewish they laud as brilliant and definitely intended.
What college did you attend that indoctrinated you to hate wealthy people to this extreme?
Does it trigger you that Q+ is a billionaire?
Laura Loomer is part of the rat pack of conservative influencers that all spawned onto the scene simultaneously, including Jack Posobiec, Scott Adams, Mike Cernovich and other Alex Jones associates. I remember videos where Posobiec was chilling with Loomer -- they're all Mossad assets.
She is doing and saying things that are in the best interest of Mossad. Any focus on caring about Americans is only done as a pace-and-lead measure in order to gain influence amongst us.
I don't fall for the "Trump is incompetent, he doesn't know how to fire bad people in his administration" schtick. Trump or Q has vetted all their own administration and (even if they are bad players), they're there for a reason.
Sometimes Trump sticks people on a pedestal to give them enough rope to hang themselves. Sometimes its to get the public noticing them -- the people who will be holding the hot potato when the music stops playing.
Being a conservative pundit pays nothing. All these individuals were propped into the positions they currently hold with funding from somewhere -- and it's not from ad revenue on their twitter feeds.
Do we know what Trump wants, unequivocally? No
This is a main argument of detractors, not saying you're one ... but the main argument is "Oh, so you'll blindly follow Trump?"
Make a good argument and I'll question Trump.
But what's the actual argument? A bill from Trump (that the guy I'm responding to didn't even read), is being directly compared to a bill from Biden (which the guy I'm responding to also didn't read), and hypothesizing they're the same thing.
Is that a good argument? No ... I'll default to Trump has done nothing wrong all day long, every day under that circumstance. Make the case he did something actually wrong that is even slightly credible and I'll research it and consider it.
And even if there ends up being a good argument against Trump, in the end, I'm not so naive to think that WW3 won't have casualties. I don't expect everything the whitehats do to be great moves without collateral damage. But if I'm still here under the notion that Q allowed half the country to have decades shaved off their lifespans through covid shots -- I doubt anyone is going to provide an example more damning against Q than that.
1st class decode with zero ambiguity.