You claim that hell wasn't in the Bible before 1600. I beg to differ. It actually appears in the Geneva Bible of the mid-1500s and the Tyndale translation of the New Testament in the early 1500s.
The pope couldn't possibly have changed thousands of original manuscripts undetectably and then replaced them in intact sites for archaeologists to discover later. You don't understand how all this works.
BTW, the actual word "hell" wouldn't be in any earlier versions of the Bible as it's an English word with Germanic origins.
There are still old copies being discovered all the time. So are you claiming alterations of manuscripts from thousands of years ago? How did the pope go back in time and do that?
"Words in a book," like everything else you know?
You claim that hell wasn't in the Bible before 1600. I beg to differ. It actually appears in the Geneva Bible of the mid-1500s and the Tyndale translation of the New Testament in the early 1500s.
The pope couldn't possibly have changed thousands of original manuscripts undetectably and then replaced them in intact sites for archaeologists to discover later. You don't understand how all this works.
BTW, the actual word "hell" wouldn't be in any earlier versions of the Bible as it's an English word with Germanic origins.
Well said - but I fear the deception is strong in this one.
The Bible or rather the collection of scrolls were constantly being re written and the old ones destroyed so no record of alterations and agendas
There are still old copies being discovered all the time. So are you claiming alterations of manuscripts from thousands of years ago? How did the pope go back in time and do that?