This is a terrible argument, especially if you're against electronic vote gathering. There are no mail-in AGT ballots. You could maybe say "lol", but this does not deserve an "Indeed!". It's rhetorical nonsense. Trying to bolster your point by comparing people pressing one button on their phone to a secure election (that in my view, necessarily involves a hand count) just makes your point weaker and kind of embarrassing.

It's honestly very strange how "over-population is real and is a real problem", "electronic voting is majorly suspect and probably not as secure as a hand count by humans", and "if counting the vote takes longer than a day, that necessarily means something fishy is going on" all commingle as popular ideas alongside each other on this board.

It's like people complaining about new Pokemon games not having all the Pokemon. Time is linear (for us), populations increase, and you can't fit a growing population into the same sized box in perpetuity. Eventually, something's gotta give. Also, more people are voting than had been, as more and more are drawn screaming into the void that is partisan politics.