I get why he did what he did, but why the continued shilling for the jab? Is it because the second he says it's bad they'll have something on him? - The Great Awakening

I get why he did what he did, but why the continued shilling for the jab? Is it because the second he says it's bad they'll have something on him? (twitter.com)

posted 2 years ago by RustyShackleford777 2 years ago by RustyShackleford777 +13 / -0

26 comments

26 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (26)

sorted by:

▲ 10 ▼

– chickyrogue 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

they altered the meaning of the word vax remember

so whilst no longer hawking HCQ up front he DID REMIND EVERYONE CONSISTENTLY THAT THEY HAD A CHOICE to make'

it was never manditory under TRUMP but hey keep trying

you might hit oil someday

permalink save report block reply

▲ -1 ▼

– Little-horn -1 points 2 years ago +2 / -3

Maybe he knew how many less libs there would be if they took it bc conservatives weren't worried lol

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -5 ▼

– KimJung-Un -5 points 2 years ago +2 / -7

lmao so what? What does the mandatory aspect have anything to do with it? The shot is poison regardless.

It's not like the shot wouldn't be poison IF the government doesn't mandate it.

What kind of argument is that?

On top of that he still promotes it to this day while "died suddenly" has become a world wide issue.

Wake up, bud.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– Little-horn 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Got ur uproot bro we gotta support each other on this one

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q