A united world would be a well-informed world. They would KNOW that the global banksters have been destroying the world for millennia and want no part of it.
"United world" sounds like you are thinking of a "One world Government" what is exactly what we do NOT want. Sovern nations, each running for the PEOPLE on the other hand would be nice. Would not need to "watch your borders" for anything but, the nasty types because, "the people" of their nations will be fine and not feel the need to flee to another nation. heh.
I suppose we can share the same sentiments globally, but preserve own culture, customs, and beliefs; languages and traditions, sovereignty, national pride and heritage.
Eh, am I the only one who sees a united world as not necessarily a good thing? I’ll wait here with my borders, ideas, and free will. Thanks anyways.
A "united world" is not the same thing as "global goverance".
You don't have to surrender your nation to agree with your neighbor.
I thought Trump had made that clear.
A united world would be a well-informed world. They would KNOW that the global banksters have been destroying the world for millennia and want no part of it.
"United world" sounds like you are thinking of a "One world Government" what is exactly what we do NOT want. Sovern nations, each running for the PEOPLE on the other hand would be nice. Would not need to "watch your borders" for anything but, the nasty types because, "the people" of their nations will be fine and not feel the need to flee to another nation. heh.
I suppose we can share the same sentiments globally, but preserve own culture, customs, and beliefs; languages and traditions, sovereignty, national pride and heritage.