The issue is that there is evidence of fraud, but no court has been willing to hear the evidence. None of the evidence of fraud has made it past the assessment phase. Thus, the media narratives that there is no fraud, as they cite the courts denying the case based on equitable maxim.
Evidence exists. So the object principle of justice is in conflict with the lower courts. If Evidence exists, and no court will hear it, what can we do?
It's a "Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2022)", not a SCOTUS case, although it could become one.
The guy filing it has evidence, but no lower court with hear him. A writ of certiorari is a higher court telling a lower court they need to hear a case.
If you have evidence of a crime, but no court will admit the evidence to be heard, what can you do?
Correct my understanding if I'm off. ..
The issue is that there is evidence of fraud, but no court has been willing to hear the evidence. None of the evidence of fraud has made it past the assessment phase. Thus, the media narratives that there is no fraud, as they cite the courts denying the case based on equitable maxim.
Evidence exists. So the object principle of justice is in conflict with the lower courts. If Evidence exists, and no court will hear it, what can we do?
It's a "Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 23, 2022)", not a SCOTUS case, although it could become one.
The guy filing it has evidence, but no lower court with hear him. A writ of certiorari is a higher court telling a lower court they need to hear a case.
If you have evidence of a crime, but no court will admit the evidence to be heard, what can you do?