Seems like he means broke a law posting on Twitter, as in was trying to sell drugs or posting child pornagraphy, not running background checks to make sure someone has never broken a law in their life, especially considering he is referring to accounts specifically, not the account holder.
Based on whose judgement? A completely corrupt, compromised judge said AJ broke the law, but did he?
Seems like he means broke a law posting on Twitter, as in was trying to sell drugs or posting child pornagraphy, not running background checks to make sure someone has never broken a law in their life, especially considering he is referring to accounts specifically, not the account holder.
Ah, not broken the Twitter law. That makes a hell of a lot more sense. "Rules" would've fit much better there lol