Long time observer and skeptic. But I respect the people here, so I try to only comment when it's constructive or will feed discussion.

This is totally different from everything Q has seemed to be about prior. Oh, there's been a few hints, but mostly it's been political in nature. I suspect I know what it being referenced here, but I am uncertain if I know how to explain it. It's definitely along the lines of things that must be learned through action and initiative, rather than teaching. Which IS the one aspect that is consistent with the Q 'protocol,' if you will.

I will say this actually makes me think the Q phenomenon is even less likely to be anything more than, at best, a psychological operation. This could be a very mechanistic message shrouded in metaphysical language, but if not....then basically nothing discussed here has begun to touch the point of the Q endeavor. And it's simply been too long of a game for that to be viable. The same goes for how long Q has played coy with the identity of the enemy. While referencing fragments that have lead people down the path of assuming it to be aliens or demons.

There are times and places to play coy. But when you do it for years, it's only to fool your audience. The question then, I guess, is it you believe that Q followers are the audience, or that the target audience is the enemy.