The expose does this frequently and i dont particularly like it. The headline will make a statement and they will come to that conclusion from usually government reports or figures by diving the data and analysing it etc. But usually the report they are taking the data from often has the opposite conclusion and title as what they are claiming.
I understand why they do this since gov is hardly going to make a uturn all of a sudden and say the thing they recommended is suddenly awful making them liable but still, i wish they worded their headlines in a way that doesnt insinuate that your reading a paper from gov sources thats claiming what they say.
All that being said the actual content and analysis of the reports is solid and they are the only journalists that i actualy donate to. Theyve been calling out the bullshit from the start of covid. I think its important to keep them funded esp as uk gov recently with held the funding from their account and are now catching their tails to stay afloat.
Yeah I agree - I like the expose but I don't like their clickbait titles either. They'd get more respect if they simply said something like "further analysis of report _____ shows _____ " - something like that imho.
100% Delphi, i agree and would prefer it if they did too. Less sensational, more rational so i can link it to others without them reading the title and immediatly dismissing it.
Totally agree. Steve Kirsch is a fan of them too and donates. The Light - https://thelightpaper.co.uk/ - is another that does a commendable job. They have a national print run, and will often be seen at marches and protests.
The expose does this frequently and i dont particularly like it. The headline will make a statement and they will come to that conclusion from usually government reports or figures by diving the data and analysing it etc. But usually the report they are taking the data from often has the opposite conclusion and title as what they are claiming.
I understand why they do this since gov is hardly going to make a uturn all of a sudden and say the thing they recommended is suddenly awful making them liable but still, i wish they worded their headlines in a way that doesnt insinuate that your reading a paper from gov sources thats claiming what they say.
All that being said the actual content and analysis of the reports is solid and they are the only journalists that i actualy donate to. Theyve been calling out the bullshit from the start of covid. I think its important to keep them funded esp as uk gov recently with held the funding from their account and are now catching their tails to stay afloat.
Yeah I agree - I like the expose but I don't like their clickbait titles either. They'd get more respect if they simply said something like "further analysis of report _____ shows _____ " - something like that imho.
100% Delphi, i agree and would prefer it if they did too. Less sensational, more rational so i can link it to others without them reading the title and immediatly dismissing it.
Totally agree. Steve Kirsch is a fan of them too and donates. The Light - https://thelightpaper.co.uk/ - is another that does a commendable job. They have a national print run, and will often be seen at marches and protests.
Thanks Murphy gona check them out