Ironically perhaps, being able to point at genuine flaws in the documentary might mean it gets carried (if only to be derogatory) by media that are complicit in vax deaths up to their eyeballs. So they can point and laugh and mock the 'antivaxers'.
The more views, the more scrutiny, the more all genuine information and revelation enters the public consciousness.
Ironically perhaps, being able to point at genuine flaws in the documentary might mean it gets carried (if only to be derogatory) by media that are complicit in vax deaths up to their eyeballs. So they can point and laugh and mock the 'antivaxers'.
The more views, the more scrutiny, the more all genuine information and revelation enters the public consciousness.
...there is no such thing as "bad publicity".....