People never take the time to stop and think about what the enemy is and where their power lies.
Individuals of each nation love to hold their respective constitution in hand and scream "I have rights! You have rights!" but that piece of paper is useless. In fact it's worth less than the toilet paper you wipe your ass with IF the enforcement agencies do not follow what's written in it.
Why is policing littered with veterans and former soldiers? Who the hell thought that would be a good idea? The system. Why? The vast majority have no problem doing as told. In fact, living any other way is alien to them after spending years in the military.
Why did they spend generations brainwashing conservative children into praising and saluting cops? It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Now who does the system use when you protest under any condition?
The police.
Angry that your business is shut down and decided to remain open as a sign of protest? Cop shows up with a ticket, second time arrest.
Angry that your privacy laws are being taken away? Cop shows up with a ticket second time you're arrested for "disturbing the peace" <--- made up bullshit
There is no circumstance where the police are the good guy when it comes to fighting government tyranny. Not one
A society that praises police is a society that creates a monster that becomes uncontrollable.
I actually hate the fact that Trump constantly praises them. We need to have people who ask point the finger at them and say "Why the fuck are you breaking your oath?"
Always remember, the Police State is the absolute worst thing that can happen to a society.
Look at any country on the planet. The instability and tyranny is because the ground troops aka blue, are the ones hammering people into place.
If the GAW is to happen, the entirety of policing needs to be reevaluated.
This is the typical response of a brainwashed individual I wrote about. Hysterically you proved my point.
I never wrote anything even close to ACAB. I wrote that the institutions of policing are instrumental in the problem. And you'd have to be blind and retarded to not see that.
When you take an oath to the constitution then that is the oath you take, not to the chief who serves the mayor or governor or legislators.
"NoT EvEn ClOSE To ThE ROoT Of ThE ProBLEM"
It ain't the senile old man who makes up rules that are unconstitutional whom follows the order. The police can refuse and cite that it is unconstitutional and nothing would happen. In fact, the police could educate the public in a profound manner every single time a degenerate politician or groups of them try to push unconstitutional orders by refusing to enforce and then publicly telling why. However that is extremely rare. They just follow the order then respond "doin muh jerrb".
The funny thing is, when the few exceptions don't partake unconstitutional orders, people like you praise them as heroes. But when they do and get criticized for it, people like you will turn around and say "IT'S nOT TheiR JAHhB tO InTerPRet ConStItuIOnaLITY"
You are part of the problem. You have no idea what the enemy is yet you spout retardation the second criticism is hit.
What you've done here is essentially called them "order takers" and not even realized it. It's the result of years of brainwashing.
Police will be the ones who come to your door when the system says "no more guns". Not Nancy Pelosi. Here's a convo between you and the goons in blue
You: This is unconstitutional!
Goons: I'm just doing my job
You: You took an oath to the Constitution so help you God
Goons: I'm just doing my job
You: But I defended you when they told me you were part of the problem
Goons: Break the door down and take em all
What you've written here is just pure simpleton nonsense. I never wrote anything about law enforcement going on strike. I wrote that they took an oath to the constitution and that the constitution gives them all the power they need to not follow unconstitutional orders. There is a reason why they take an oath to it.
You seem to think that I am ignoring the responsibility of the "EleCTEd OFfiCIals".
No. I very specifically wrote that law enforcement is how the "EleCTeD OFFIClais" get their dirty work done because law enforcement carries out their unconstitutional orders.
During the Boston bombing they raided entire neighborhoods door to door. But let me guess, you're probably going to say that I see that as unconstitutional and that it really wasn't. Right?
People like you like to make simple things complicated. Every policing institution in this country takes an oath to the constitution. None of them follow it.
I suspect you live in an area where the police are known to you and have never been put into a situation where their oath was tested so you have some sort of emotional attachment cause you don't understand the context of my post at all and have gone off into making up nonsense "what ifs" that don't apply.