Well of course, any claim for redress of grievance is an expression of the first amendment, as it is in there.
When it comes to the wiki page section, it is actually quite shocking that a majority in congress decided to censor and even prohibited discussion of received mail.
I get it. Here you are, as a representative, walking around happy as a dog with 7 dicks. Then all of a sudden, you are besieged by petitions for a redress of grievances. You need to read all that mail, write a response ....No ... you actually have to work hard a s a representative. So, how best to have this killed?
It is a game they always play.
It goes to show how quickly the Constitution was attacked and tried to be put out of operation. Of course the people who voted for such measures were not persecuted for breaking their oath of office .....
Well of course, any claim for redress of grievance is an expression of the first amendment, as it is in there.
When it comes to the wiki page section, it is actually quite shocking that a majority in congress decided to censor and even prohibited discussion of received mail.
I get it. Here you are, as a representative, walking around happy as a dog with 7 dicks. Then all of a sudden, you are besieged by petitions for a redress of grievances. You need to read all that mail, write a response ....No ... you actually have to work hard a s a representative. So, how best to have this killed?
It is a game they always play.
It goes to show how quickly the Constitution was attacked and tried to be put out of operation. Of course the people who voted for such measures were not persecuted for breaking their oath of office .....
Didn’t realize Brunson v. Adams was a 1A claim…
I also got to know through the interviews of Loy Brunson!
1 small stone, allowed David to destroy Goliath 🤞