Really? In a democracy is it really necessary to have representatives when we can all instantly represent ourselves? I've been thinking about this ever since the internet poped up, anyone can instantly communicate with anyone instantly. Why keep such a corrupt, evil system around, when we could create something new that actually reflects the will of the people? In my opinion it is time to get rid of so called representatives and start representing ourselves.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
a) RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by) implies as perceiving partial to perceivable whole...not to the suggestions of others who call themselves representatives.
b) choice can only exist within the center of balance aka in-between need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information).
c) one cannot give away free will of choice...only ignore ones ones choice within perceivable for the suggested choices by others. This represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of perceivable balance (action) to perceiving choice (reaction) natural law.
d) the industrialization of contract law through mass suggestion is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew", which represents choice to choice (bind anew) over balance to choice (natural bond).