Technically both sides are potentially guilty of grooming by sexualization of minors. I saw my first vagina under the supervision of heterosexuals in a bar when I was a child. Can't imagine it was planned, maybe I was supposed to be interested in the video games at the bar. But I seen't it and pardon the vulgarity, it was well worn. Not really something you look forward to later in life. Like a McDonald's Big Mac commercial vs a McDonald's Big Mac, no shade. Children are going to be pressured by their family and peers enough, I do not know that it is within the best interest to promote any.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Sexual sin is sin. To distinguish between the particulars is only helpful when a category is required, that is rare. Displaying nude woman to men is the same sin as displaying nude men to men.
Sexuality has been in the past and should be still promoted in a healthy non-sinful way. Modesty is of course a key element.
The problem is western society has been designed such that everything is sexualized and it has been pushed that it is the entire purpose of life. That has to change.
Well I think that it then boils down to WHO (not world health organization) should be promoting it. We are also told to love our enemies and that seems to be difficult or not possible. Jesus told us who wouldn't get into heaven, it is not anyone else's concern other than you introduce them to the gospel of Christ. It really isn't our business what they do, it is our business what we do.
Of course healthy sex should be promoted at an appropriate age but who better to choose than the parents of the individual?
I should probably just stop asking questions and wait on Jesus to sort it out.