...over the course of the past 2 years, it has been brought to my attention that I am only presenting one side of the argument when it comes to the "cause and effect" of the "Covid Situation"...

...so in respect to free speech and an open forum to all ideas, Unleashed has opened its platform to this discussion....

...do not take this as an endorsement from me on the validity of the material presented...

...Unleashed is simply a conduit to allow these ideas to reach awareness...

...of course, all comments will be welcomed....

...just remember to be happy pups and play nicely in the doggy park...

...and let the show begin....

Germs don't exist and you don't have to be a rocket surgeon to understand this. What you will need to do is entertain two seemingly opposing ideas at once for a time as you ponder what is explained.

Let me start by saying 99% of us have likely had the experience of apparently "catching or passing a bug" between family members, co-workers, etc. at some point in our lives. This is what we've all been taught is happening, doctors included. But if this weren't true, there must be another explanation. And there is. I'll get to that after first explaining how we now know that viruses don't exist and then, how we know there's no such thing as a "pathogenic/contagious" bacteria, although they do indeed exist.

The original definition of a "virus" was a "toxic or noxious substance". In the early 1900s, following about 20 years of fraudulent "germ theory" being promoted by establishment institutions, the definition subtly changed to being "a microbe smaller than a bacteria that cannot be seen". This "microbe" was ASSUMED to exist of course as no telescope could yet see things smaller than bacteria. And this ASSUMPTION is the basis of all the work Louis Pasteur ever did as he did not possess the instruments to see what he boldly CLAIMED was the cause of dis-eases like rabies.

In the early 1930s the electron microscope was created enabling scientists to see things smaller than bacteria. The next 20 years medical scientists fumbled and faltered through trying to identify these so-called tiny "viruses" but continuously failed. So much so, the unpopular field of "virology" is all but dead and non-existent. It isn't until the revival of virology in the mid-1950s that we get the modern-day definition of a unicorn virus being "a strand of RNA or DNA with a protein coating". My how much it's changed over the years!

John Enders to the rescue in 1954. Enders, being more of a technician then a scientist, is recruited in 1949 to assist the then famous Jonas Salk and his alleged "polio vaccine" efforts. Enders eventually creates a method for "culturing" unicorn viruses. His technique involves the use of unusual Green monkey kidney cells, chromosomally abnormal in their own right and highly sensitive and reactive to any kind of stressors. He chooses very specific anti-biotics (against-lifes) known to be poisonous to kidney tissue, namely gentamicin, streptomycin & Amphotericin B in particular. The ostensible reason for use of these against-lifes is to "kill any bacteria that may be on the monkey kidney cells".

There are a few other items tossed into the cell culture but none are important to know or understand really. The last ingredient for producing our unicorn virus is to add the bodily fluids from a person sick with the disease in question. The most important thing to understand about these fluids is that they do not check these bodily fluids for the presence of one, let alone potentially multiple unicorn viruses prior to adding them to culture. The scientists simply ASSUME the one particular unicorn virus they blame as the culprit must be in the bodily fluids.

Remarkably (sarcasm), these green monkey kidney cells always begin to decay and disintegrate without fail. The particles and remnants of these cells are then stained onto a glass slide with the use of heavy metals and other toxic chemicals in preparation for viewing them under an electron microscope. And voila, like magic, on certain slides they are able to take pictures of tiny particles of varying size and dimension, draw a red arrow on their picture and name them "ABC virus". Just as they suspected! And like magic again, this works EVERY SINGLE TIME!! And this is the end of their scientific process with viral culturing. No further testing or effort is ever done.

But there are numerous problems with this viral culturing process that even the untrained and uneducated layperson can detect. Not the least of which is that these "scientists" never check the bodily fluid sample for the existence of the alleged culprit virus ahead of time. What if there were two or more in the mix? Could it be there were none? And why don't they check first? Surprise surprise - because they say they CAN'T, that it's TOO HARD*, that there's NOT ENOUGH VIRUS TO FIND in this small sample. Strange, wouldn't you agree? As they never have any problem finding the unicorn viruses at the bottom of the test tube after disintegrating the kidney cells.

But there's yet another problem here. These so-called virologist "scientists" never run any control experiments nor attempt to falsify their hypothesis that there's a "virus" that's causing these monkey kidney cells to break down in the first place. How odd? They don't even follow the most basic tenets of the scientific method. Wouldn't that then make them pseudoscientists by definition?

As luck would have it, John Enders was the last person to run such a control experiment back in 1954. In his infamous measles paper describing the viral culturing method for the first time and still used to this day, he does run such a control experiment and states quite clearly that the results of his control experiment that did not include the alleged "infected bodily fluids" were INDISTINGUISHABLE from his main experiment. Thus, there must have been something else in the toxic culture mixture that destroyed the monkey kidney cells. How interesting. Most of you can probably guess what that might be I'll bet.

In 2020, former virologist Dr. Stephan Lanka repeated Enders 1954 control experiment and got the exact same results. As is clear to everybody right now, the causal factor of the green monkey kidney cell disintegration are the antibiotics, which are poisonous to kidney tissue. There's nothing complicated about any of this.

You might wonder, how come no virologist has noticed this in the last 68 years and pointed out the obvious? That's a darn good question I can't answer.

We would also like to know why virologists like to proudly state that they've ISOLATED unicorn viruses thousands upon thousands of times in their careers. Well as it turns out, the field of virology cleverly decided to create a new definition for the word ISOLATION without explaining that to us gullible laypeople. As it turns out, in virology ISOLATION means either to separate the bodily fluid sample from the actual body, or to separate the fluid sample from the swab/sample-device. How fascinating is that? So after jamming the cranial scrape up millions of people's noses during Covid-1984 and then separating the swab from your nasal contents and fluids, they had themselves an ISOLATED VIRUS as the remainder, never mind the mucous, boogers, cranial tissue, blood, hairs, dust and everything else in the mix as well qualifies as a VIRUS in their world!! How slick a deception is this?

Why do you suppose anybody would need to be so deceptive in their practices in the first place? Unless....

In the past 20 years these virologists invented a new way to "find unicorn viruses" they like to call "Sanger sequencing" or "Metagenomic sequencing". Sounds fancy and crazy technical. But it's not really. We don't need to know all the fancy details. The same essential deception is at work. With this technique these technicians get the tissue or fluid sample from a sick person and use their high-tech instrumentation to then detect all the RNA or DNA in the sample. Once again, they ASSUME the unicorn virus exists within the sample. After a process of rejecting longer strands of recognizable human RNA in the sample, the technicians are left with itsy, bitsy, teeny weeny partial pieces of RNA to play with, the origin of which RNA is entirely unknown. But a 5th grader could easily guess that it's just more human RNA that exists in all of us and is a natural part of apoptosis (cell breakdown). But the highly edumacated virologists apparently know better!

Unlike "Gene Sequencing" which is done for every other RNA/DNA sample in the world where the technicians start with a complete and known fully intact strand of RNA/DNA which they then snip apart at various points to analyze, our virologists do something quite different. They have been provided with a COMPUTER MODEL of what they're told is a "unicorn virus", at which point they go about taking these tiny strands of RNA and STITCHING THEM TOGETHER in an ASSEMBLY process which the computer is capable of building out until it reaches something roughly resembling their computer model goal. This is GENE ASSEMBLY IN SILICO having no basis in reality.

What's most interesting about all these "Sanger Sequencing" techniques is that these scientists never find a FULLY INTACT VIRUS in these samples of bodily fluids. Just like their predecessors who stopped looking for them in the 1940s.

How odd is that? All they can ever find is shattered pieces of unicorn viruses in reality, but never the real McCoy!

But how can this be? Is it possible no medical scientist or researcher in the history of the world has ever found an ACTUAL VIRUS in the real world? It is indeed. This is what they regretfully admit. As apparently it's "too hard" to find a virus in the real world according to them. In fact, one virologist told doctors Andrew Kaufman and Tom Cowan that they couldn't find any viruses in a vat filled with the bodily fluids of 10,000 people all with the same disease!! Now contrast that with the idea that your spouse can be standing 5.99 feet away from you and launch a microscopic piece of spittle in your general direction, LOADED with unicorn viruses that can make you ill a short while later. Can these two "facts" even be reconciled?

Dr. Cowan was recently contacted by a scientist who has made a living by finding very hard to detect particles and substances in all sorts of situations, including in human beings. He said a virus would be a cake-walk for him to find based on all the published data. But strangely, he has never been asked to do this in his 40-year career of finding hard to find stuff. I wonder why?

Another interesting data point is that no scientist has ever been able to satisfy the very basic "Koch's Postulates" which are so simple and logical. They state: take the "thing" from the sick person that you say is causing their dis-ease, isolate the "thing" from all other "things" and then give it to a healthy person who does not have that "thing" in them. Then, show how the healthy person then gets sick with the same disease and now has the "thing" in him/her. Very simple stuff. But today's virologists love to talk about how Koch's Postulates are "old and outdated" in today's world of high-tech scientism. Why should they need to do such a archaic demonstration of actually showing dis-ease transmission when they can assemble Frankenstein viruses on the fly with the flick of a switch these days?

As luck would have it, many scientists also tried to satisfy Koch's Postulates using very REAL bacteria for many decades in the 1920-1950 time period. They too failed to successfully prove they could transfer bacteria from a sick to healthy person and cause the same disease. How strange, no?

Naturally all this research is very difficult to find and greatly suppressed.

Now, what's doubly-fascinating is that you can find recent scientific papers that tell you right in the abstract "Koch's Postulates were satisfied". In fact, the primary SARS-COV2 / Covid-19 paper that started the whole scamdemic says exactly this!! It serves a tremendous purpose as most of our doctors aren't educated on how to perform Koch's Postulates nor do they have time to read incredibly pedantic and technical scientific papers. But if anybody cares to take a few hours to educate themselves on what Koch's Postulates are and then read the Methods section of this Covid-1984 paper they could see for themselves that nobody even ATTEMPTED to satisfy Koch's Postulates. How strange? it's almost as if they think we're just a bunch of ignorant sheeple that blindly trust authority or something, eh?

But I can hear the doubt from my fellow anons. Well then how do you explain how I "caught" Covid-1984 from my husband/wife/child/boss/co-worker/etc. And how about that time everybody in the house had the flu at the same time? And how can you explain rabies, polio, small pox, Spanish flu, HIV, ebola, bubonic plague, scurvy, measles, chicken pox, etc. etc. etc.

Believe it or not, there's an explanation for each one of these and all the rest you care to name. But space is limited in this thread so, depending on the feedback and curiosity of my fellow GA anons, and with the agreement of AshlandDog, I'll write a new thread next week explaining the individual dis-eases wrongly blamed on the yet-to-be-found, highly elusive unicorn virus, even more elusive then Bigfoot!

Suffice it to say, we all underestimate the power of our minds and the power of fear, worry, concern, etc. by an extraodirnary amount. This explains some of the "viral diseases" but not all. Toxins and poisons come into play with some as well.

And why did I say "germs don't exist" at the top of this thread? Because the definition of "germ" today indicates something pathogenic/contagious/infectious. Yet no such contagion has ever been scientifically demonstrated to date. The role of bacteria has been taught to us as a half-truth. I'll explain this as well next week if people are interested.

If it isn't abundantly clear to everyone here, TPTB want you scared, powerless and helpless more than anything else. Because once you're caught in these emotions, you give your power away to them. And this is how they do what they do. So take back your power and have no fear. This is what changes the game in our favor for the first time in many millennia!

Happy to answer technical questions below but I'll save the individual viral diseases for a separate thread so they can be seen all at once.

For those who want to see a well-put-together documentary covering most of what I've written above, here's "The Viral Delusion" for your viewing pleasure:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jajyAdPMdzfJ/

And for those who want a bit more technical explanation on why germ theory is a fraud in total, here's "The End of Germ Theory" covering both unicorn viruses as well as bacteria: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ch8v4TVL9yq0/

Thanks!

The antivirus league