well agreed itself implies someone suggested it to him, someone else said "sir this happened, do you agree?"
So the gravity of acknowledgement, the Most powerful man in the country has just agreed that someone is trying or was trying to perform an illegal coup against him, a man tasked with a whole nation's well being, safety, security, liberty and such.
A man who also happens to be the only one, to my knowledge who can initiate the use of nukes, the biggest weapons on earth, that may be wrong I'm not American and i don't know the way the chain of command works on this.
A country's lynchpin just had someone attempt to override it illegally.
Its safe to say it will have consequences, arrests will be made people will be prosecuted, but not just any people, people who put a whole country in danger for their own gain, if you can endanger 320 million people for your gain, you can do just about anything, so if you want to prosecute these folks you gotta get it right, perfectly right, so they can never find their way into a situation where they could do such a thing again.
You need to make the prosecution against them fool proof, impossible to wiggle out of over minutia, or technicalities, so how do you do that? Lets think, for starters, you catch them in the act, they can argue it was a one time thing, so you catch them in the act after you've caught them doing it more than once but never let them realize, you document everything they do so it can all be scrutinized to prove irrefutably that it wasn't a one time thing, they knew it was wrong, they thought it through, then saw it to completion, willingly.
All the while you watch everything they do, and collect it all, so that it can serve to clearly show their character, show them to be the monster you're charging them of being. This would have to include stuff said or done in private, but getting ahold of that takes time, and you have to prove a need to know it through the court to get discovery.
How do you introduce the truth to people who are asleep? well that depends, do you want them to wake up with a shock? do you want them to wake up gradually, and calmly? do you want them to wake up of their own accord or do you want to shake them awake?
Shock is simple, you throw cold water on them and boom, wakey wakey, fight or flighty. If you want them to wake up gradually, you might poke them, whisper to them, talk softly quietly, but loud enough to rouse them bit by bit, maybe jostle them gently, they might grumble and complain and try to go back to sleep so you keep at it till they give up and get up. If you want them to wake up in their own time its simple, you just wait. and when they're done sleeping they'll wake up on their own.
Mention has been made again and again of declas, but I can't get any clear details, what's being declassed? when is it being declassed? why is it being declassed? what will it reveal that can be used to not only wake people up, but to make the case against the bad guys that much more irrefutable? Declassification id assume takes time, cuz someone has to go through it, and check for anything that can cause harm to innocent people, folks just in the wrong place at the wrong time. And of course you need to be able to clearly discern the good guys, the bad guys, and the bystanders, that would take a huge amount of time, and its not static, its ongoing, dynamic and fluid, like water, if you want to use it, it has to be clean, filtered, and such so you have to sift through it and remove the muck, and yuck, the less muddy the water, the clearer you can see into it.
Then the point about the message having to be direct, well if its going to be direct it has to be clear, concise and easy to understand to everyone who might see it, it also has to be equally simple and straight forward to find out that what the message entails is true, to get even a vague idea of the truth on this stuff we have to jump through hoops online and follow bread crumb trails that lead everywhere and nowhere, that's neither simple, nor straight forward, so our job is to find the bits and bobs that are needed, and figure out a way to put it into simple terms with easy to find proof, sounds kinda like memes.
Next you have to get around the fake news people who aren't talking about any of it. Well this means you need everyone to have access to another source of info equally as easy to use or find as msm, if not more so. So social media then? Its far less controlled, and policeable than msm stuff is, and the viral factor has much more influence in social media circles, news travels quickly as does rumor, and both can quickly catch fire and explode into news everyone has heard about long before msm ever reports on it. So you need feelers and ears to find important news, and fashion it into something that can and will reliably spread like wildfire to every corner of the globe, faster than anyone can hope to silence it, again this sounds like memes.
You need a means of getting it started on its way, in such a manner that it then becomes self sustaining and runs away with itself, social media I'm guessing is what this means of spreading info is meant to be, there's that bit about the EBS coming into play, problem there is its not as widely spread and accessible as it once was, its mainly run off of television and radio, in a pinch it could be used to override the msm and any efforts to shut it down or stop it because its a critical means of alerting the country, anyone who cut the transmission could be charged for it more than likely. I don't know about American but i know some countries send EBS alerts out over phone networks now.
I remember seeing bits about a several hour long documentary that will be played for everyone to watch and listen to, to me this seems counterintuitive if you want this news to go everywhere very quickly, not everyone is going to be able to just stop what they're doing and sit down to watch for 8 hours or whatever, so it needs to be short, attention getting, and impossible to ignore, sounds alot like social media, brief blurbs. And you'll need this short message to be so profound and impactful, it will convince people that what its saying is true, and motivate them to immediately seek out the truth for themselves.
well agreed itself implies someone suggested it to him, someone else said "sir this happened, do you agree?"
So the gravity of acknowledgement, the Most powerful man in the country has just agreed that someone is trying or was trying to perform an illegal coup against him, a man tasked with a whole nation's well being, safety, security, liberty and such.
A man who also happens to be the only one, to my knowledge who can initiate the use of nukes, the biggest weapons on earth, that may be wrong I'm not American and i don't know the way the chain of command works on this.
A country's lynchpin just had someone attempt to override it illegally.
Its safe to say it will have consequences, arrests will be made people will be prosecuted, but not just any people, people who put a whole country in danger for their own gain, if you can endanger 320 million people for your gain, you can do just about anything, so if you want to prosecute these folks you gotta get it right, perfectly right, so they can never find their way into a situation where they could do such a thing again.
You need to make the prosecution against them fool proof, impossible to wiggle out of over minutia, or technicalities, so how do you do that? Lets think, for starters, you catch them in the act, they can argue it was a one time thing, so you catch them in the act after you've caught them doing it more than once but never let them realize, you document everything they do so it can all be scrutinized to prove irrefutably that it wasn't a one time thing, they knew it was wrong, they thought it through, then saw it to completion, willingly.
All the while you watch everything they do, and collect it all, so that it can serve to clearly show their character, show them to be the monster you're charging them of being. This would have to include stuff said or done in private, but getting ahold of that takes time, and you have to prove a need to know it through the court to get discovery.
How do you introduce the truth to people who are asleep? well that depends, do you want them to wake up with a shock? do you want them to wake up gradually, and calmly? do you want them to wake up of their own accord or do you want to shake them awake?
Shock is simple, you throw cold water on them and boom, wakey wakey, fight or flighty. If you want them to wake up gradually, you might poke them, whisper to them, talk softly quietly, but loud enough to rouse them bit by bit, maybe jostle them gently, they might grumble and complain and try to go back to sleep so you keep at it till they give up and get up. If you want them to wake up in their own time its simple, you just wait. and when they're done sleeping they'll wake up on their own.
Mention has been made again and again of declas, but I can't get any clear details, what's being declassed? when is it being declassed? why is it being declassed? what will it reveal that can be used to not only wake people up, but to make the case against the bad guys that much more irrefutable? Declassification id assume takes time, cuz someone has to go through it, and check for anything that can cause harm to innocent people, folks just in the wrong place at the wrong time. And of course you need to be able to clearly discern the good guys, the bad guys, and the bystanders, that would take a huge amount of time, and its not static, its ongoing, dynamic and fluid, like water, if you want to use it, it has to be clean, filtered, and such so you have to sift through it and remove the muck, and yuck, the less muddy the water, the clearer you can see into it.
Then the point about the message having to be direct, well if its going to be direct it has to be clear, concise and easy to understand to everyone who might see it, it also has to be equally simple and straight forward to find out that what the message entails is true, to get even a vague idea of the truth on this stuff we have to jump through hoops online and follow bread crumb trails that lead everywhere and nowhere, that's neither simple, nor straight forward, so our job is to find the bits and bobs that are needed, and figure out a way to put it into simple terms with easy to find proof, sounds kinda like memes.
Next you have to get around the fake news people who aren't talking about any of it. Well this means you need everyone to have access to another source of info equally as easy to use or find as msm, if not more so. So social media then? Its far less controlled, and policeable than msm stuff is, and the viral factor has much more influence in social media circles, news travels quickly as does rumor, and both can quickly catch fire and explode into news everyone has heard about long before msm ever reports on it. So you need feelers and ears to find important news, and fashion it into something that can and will reliably spread like wildfire to every corner of the globe, faster than anyone can hope to silence it, again this sounds like memes.
You need a means of getting it started on its way, in such a manner that it then becomes self sustaining and runs away with itself, social media I'm guessing is what this means of spreading info is meant to be, there's that bit about the EBS coming into play, problem there is its not as widely spread and accessible as it once was, its mainly run off of television and radio, in a pinch it could be used to override the msm and any efforts to shut it down or stop it because its a critical means of alerting the country, anyone who cut the transmission could be charged for it more than likely. I don't know about American but i know some countries send EBS alerts out over phone networks now.
I remember seeing bits about a several hour long documentary that will be played for everyone to watch and listen to, to me this seems counterintuitive if you want this news to go everywhere very quickly, not everyone is going to be able to just stop what they're doing and sit down to watch for 8 hours or whatever, so it needs to be short, attention getting, and impossible to ignore, sounds alot like social media, brief blurbs. And you'll need this short message to be so profound and impactful, it will convince people that what its saying is true, and motivate them to immediately seek out the truth for themselves.