It's been frustrating discussing on this site. I will ask, "How do you know.." then the reply will be a Q quote. Even though we do not know who this person is, or the fact that no good news has really happened ‐if not this year, then 8 years into the future perhaps is the understood expectation‐ never wavering in their faith, much like a south Pacific cargo cult. All bad news is spun as 5d chess, as in trump hired the worst for his cabinet members but knew enough to know the behavior of future judges. A tad frustrating.
No problem with that and know what I'm getting into. Enjoy the commentary for the most part. I guess I would like to discuss things sometimes instead just being read scripture. But yeah, the logo is at the top.
Yes it is frustrating and I have been banned many times over for raising salient questions which have uneasy elements about them.
I enjoy coming here to see some lesser known news items and at the end of the day I’m on the anons side too, just minus the faith in Q and Trump.
For example, a fair and simple point is the following:
Trump said he’d like to lose it all to see who was loyal to him in a tv interview from the 80s or 90s.
He subsequently DID lose it all. And who was loyal to him? Who bailed him out? It was the bankruptcy guru for the Rothschilds, Wilbur Ross.
And how did Trump repay his loyalty? He made Wilbur Ross his Commerce Secretary.
Now that is a swampy appointment if ever there was one as it put a Rothschilds guy in direct control of Commerce.
Why doesn’t that make anons take at least a little pause for thought? What do they make of it?
It’s a completely fair point that I’m sure they would otherwise be minded to consider and address meaningfully were it not for the fact that Trump and Q command, and receive from them, an unwavering, unquestioning loyalty.
There’s many more questionable things about the whole phenomenon which ought to be reasonably addressed but I think some anons - and certainly those with a whip hand on this site - can’t bring themselves to countenance the possible implications of such a detached and dispassionate reassessment.
Without meaning to be insulting, I agree with you that there is a cult like element to it all. It is quasi-religious - exactly like their counterparts on the Critical Theory-based Diversity and Inclusion woke hive of insurgents.
It’s pretty clear to me that Q is, amongst other things, a reference to Star Trek whilst their woke counterparts represent the Borg- hoovering up all diversity and assimilating it into its big hive mind. This is further underlined by the vaccine program being called Warp Speed. It seems to me to be just one big harmful, uncaring, anti-human joke on either side. Two sides of the same coin. The two heads of the two-headed eagle. Dark to Light, Great Reset vs Great Awakening where both paths lead to the same place.
If you look in the counterinsurgency manual for example it even says outright that the insurgents grievances become addressed and incorporated into the new order.
I will give Sleepydude some credit though - his contributions are well thought out and he puts them across excellently. I’d love to pick his brain.
It's been frustrating discussing on this site. I will ask, "How do you know.." then the reply will be a Q quote. Even though we do not know who this person is, or the fact that no good news has really happened ‐if not this year, then 8 years into the future perhaps is the understood expectation‐ never wavering in their faith, much like a south Pacific cargo cult. All bad news is spun as 5d chess, as in trump hired the worst for his cabinet members but knew enough to know the behavior of future judges. A tad frustrating.
Well...
This is a Q site after all.
No problem with that and know what I'm getting into. Enjoy the commentary for the most part. I guess I would like to discuss things sometimes instead just being read scripture. But yeah, the logo is at the top.
Yes it is frustrating and I have been banned many times over for raising salient questions which have uneasy elements about them.
I enjoy coming here to see some lesser known news items and at the end of the day I’m on the anons side too, just minus the faith in Q and Trump.
For example, a fair and simple point is the following:
Trump said he’d like to lose it all to see who was loyal to him in a tv interview from the 80s or 90s.
He subsequently DID lose it all. And who was loyal to him? Who bailed him out? It was the bankruptcy guru for the Rothschilds, Wilbur Ross.
And how did Trump repay his loyalty? He made Wilbur Ross his Commerce Secretary.
Now that is a swampy appointment if ever there was one as it put a Rothschilds guy in direct control of Commerce.
Why doesn’t that make anons take at least a little pause for thought? What do they make of it?
It’s a completely fair point that I’m sure they would otherwise be minded to consider and address meaningfully were it not for the fact that Trump and Q command, and receive from them, an unwavering, unquestioning loyalty.
There’s many more questionable things about the whole phenomenon which ought to be reasonably addressed but I think some anons - and certainly those with a whip hand on this site - can’t bring themselves to countenance the possible implications of such a detached and dispassionate reassessment.
Without meaning to be insulting, I agree with you that there is a cult like element to it all. It is quasi-religious - exactly like their counterparts on the Critical Theory-based Diversity and Inclusion woke hive of insurgents.
It’s pretty clear to me that Q is, amongst other things, a reference to Star Trek whilst their woke counterparts represent the Borg- hoovering up all diversity and assimilating it into its big hive mind. This is further underlined by the vaccine program being called Warp Speed. It seems to me to be just one big harmful, uncaring, anti-human joke on either side. Two sides of the same coin. The two heads of the two-headed eagle. Dark to Light, Great Reset vs Great Awakening where both paths lead to the same place.
If you look in the counterinsurgency manual for example it even says outright that the insurgents grievances become addressed and incorporated into the new order.
I will give Sleepydude some credit though - his contributions are well thought out and he puts them across excellently. I’d love to pick his brain.