Correct. And I am on the record about how I feel about this case. People interested can review my history. Needless to say, I predict 0 of 9 votes to take this case. And even if they did, they aren't trying the case, the issue before the court is whether the district court erred in finding no subject matter jurisdiction. In the bizarre event that SCOTUS takes this case, they won't be talking about national security, fraud, or hearing any evidence. It will be a legal analysis as to whether the complaint has subject matter jurisdiction of federal courts or not. Not a hint more than this.
If they did somehow find subject matter jurisdiction, the district court is just going to boot it on remand for some other shortcoming.
It does not appear that rule 11 is in play. The docket says its on appeal from 10th circuit. So there is no bypassing of the appellate courts here. And even if rule 11 was in play, it means very little. States have an equivalent of rule 11 and it is used regularly.
Oh, if this guy is a "Constitutional Scholar" then I am both the King and Queen of England. And maybe even a prince.
Correct. And I am on the record about how I feel about this case. People interested can review my history. Needless to say, I predict 0 of 9 votes to take this case. And even if they did, they aren't trying the case, the issue before the court is whether the district court erred in finding no subject matter jurisdiction. In the bizarre event that SCOTUS takes this case, they won't be talking about national security, fraud, or hearing any evidence. It will be a legal analysis as to whether the complaint has subject matter jurisdiction of federal courts or not. Not a hint more than this.
If they did somehow find subject matter jurisdiction, the district court is just going to boot it on remand for some other shortcoming.
It does not appear that rule 11 is in play. The docket says its on appeal from 10th circuit. So there is no bypassing of the appellate courts here. And even if rule 11 was in play, it means very little. States have an equivalent of rule 11 and it is used regularly.
Oh, if this guy is a "Constitutional Scholar" then I am both the King and Queen of England. And maybe even a prince.