The Supreme Court from what I understand cannot remove The president the vice president or congress from their seats of power but can make a ruling that would allow the military to step in take that action.

The Brunson case isn't an overthrow.

But it is a big enough pebble thrown into the pond to cause a ripple.

Time will tell if it goes any further but I do not see the SC offering a remedy that involves an "overthrow". But it may be a big enough opening to allow other issues to come to the forefront.

Not for every thing, we still have to get adjusted to enforcing our own freedom. We the People did not remain vigilant, and we allowed them the right to treat us badly. They did it so slowly that we went ahead and let them do it. My brother learned the real laws and he liked to go around and L.A. and get tickets. It got to where the Judge would see him walk in and clear the court room. Imagine being the judge when a sloppy guy with hair in a pony tail, overalls with paint all over them, one suspender not in use so his pants were crooked. He would go to the front pull out about a thousand tickets and demand a jury trial for each one. Cases dismissed. It is our right after all. He studied the Constitution and for definitions he only used Blacks Law, because the Authors did.

The judges should be in support of you representing yourself. You should not need someone to represent you, proceedings are supposed to be able to be understood by the common man. The deep state brought down required IQ level for Police for a reason. Most police do not know the law and just do what they think they are told; I have attorneys because I have to go to court for many things. I did have to go to criminal court once and the Judge was thrilled to see me represent myself and had no problem with me using my brother at council.as is my right. You have a right to counsel of choice.

Right before our eyes this is changing

The only solution is in the Declaration.