Can a satellite see the hair on your arm from space? Does geo location exist? Is he a sherriff in a hotly contested part of this whole ordeal? Do we not carry around things on such devices as vehicles, phones, and the like, that can ID us?
Is he really that hard to single out as a target?
Not hard to see where the logic in your argument falls flat.
"Isn't technology a thing?" is not great rhetoric, because it leads to a lot of hand-waving of logic. If I gave you my location in real-time, and I don't think this drunk Gilbert Arizona yocal had such, you still would have a very hard time hitting me oncoming while I made an unprotected left. You conspiracy folks are very 'Let no tragedy' go to waste. It's childish, gross, and a dumb way of thinking.
Got any other names you want to call me, and anyone else who doesn't see things as you do?
Conspiracies are real, often enough. You wouldn't be on here if there wasn't something compelling to the whole thing. Not all are valid or logical, true, but this one is a lil to sus to rule it out entirely. Especially the location.
I never said or agreed that this was a hit, yet you've decided to attack a swath of people who do by calling names. Grow up.
Occam's freaking Razor. I could give you my location in real-time, and I STILL don't think YOU could hit me as ONCOMING traffic, while I make an unprotected left turn at an intersection. This is so incredibly childish, and worse, takes a very TRAGIC event that has happened to someone we might admire, and adopts it for a narrative that might not be true
This is the exact same "Let no tragedy go to waste" BS from the other side.
To a VERY specific target - you left that part out. So yes... it'd be very tough. Grow up.
Can a satellite see the hair on your arm from space? Does geo location exist? Is he a sherriff in a hotly contested part of this whole ordeal? Do we not carry around things on such devices as vehicles, phones, and the like, that can ID us?
Is he really that hard to single out as a target?
Not hard to see where the logic in your argument falls flat.
"Isn't technology a thing?" is not great rhetoric, because it leads to a lot of hand-waving of logic. If I gave you my location in real-time, and I don't think this drunk Gilbert Arizona yocal had such, you still would have a very hard time hitting me oncoming while I made an unprotected left. You conspiracy folks are very 'Let no tragedy' go to waste. It's childish, gross, and a dumb way of thinking.
Got any other names you want to call me, and anyone else who doesn't see things as you do?
Conspiracies are real, often enough. You wouldn't be on here if there wasn't something compelling to the whole thing. Not all are valid or logical, true, but this one is a lil to sus to rule it out entirely. Especially the location.
I never said or agreed that this was a hit, yet you've decided to attack a swath of people who do by calling names. Grow up.
It's the method that is no good. Nobody said assassinations don't happen.
To think this is one defies logic and common sense.
Occam's freaking Razor. I could give you my location in real-time, and I STILL don't think YOU could hit me as ONCOMING traffic, while I make an unprotected left turn at an intersection. This is so incredibly childish, and worse, takes a very TRAGIC event that has happened to someone we might admire, and adopts it for a narrative that might not be true
This is the exact same "Let no tragedy go to waste" BS from the other side.