This lady's entire premise is based on 2 USC Section 9 "or voting machine the use of which has been duly authorized by the State law." and then claims, with ZERO evidence, that modern voting machines don't fit the bill.

The problem is, this section is entirely self-executing. The 'voting machine' could be ANYTHING, literally, anything, and as long as it was authorized by State law (which all machines currently are and always have been), then nothing is 'broken', in premise 2 of her argument. Lady needs to read up on the USC and its relationship to state law, and rhetoric in general.

Secondly, if her premise WERE true, then Trump is not President NOW, or in 2016. This dancing near sov-cit legal voodoo BS.

Deepseek rattled the AI model industry when it was released - why? It was accurate as the other models from Anthro and OpenAi at the time, but more importantly it was trained using thousands and thousands of outdated chips - the one they were sanctioned to use.

Well then it can't be both ways. Either Patel is running and is in charge, and just not providing answers, or he's complicit? Answers would only come from him.

It's Trump's FBI? Why shouldn't we trust it. Serious question.

I'll keep reposting this as others keep falling for this legal voodoo bullshit on this board. Now we have new age resonance nonsense added to pile of nonsense?

We already talked about this this (twice now) week, and it's all very, very retarded.

The theory:

1. America isn't... something? Never claims what's lacking, but its definitely secreted away in Maritime Law, which is apparently so opaque nobody can see through it except a few 'tards on the net.
2. In order to fix, whatever it is, "the people’s visible [and further down 'EXPLICIT'] endorsement of the transition into America’s New Order' is required.
3. The president holding an MMA fight is the people's EXPLICIT endorsement. Not a vote, not legislation, not a Declaration of Independence. A prize fight. Could it have been a concert? A play? A puppet show? Would a ventriloquist act be the PEOPLE's explicit endorsement?
4. As soon as the hand of the winner is raised, America is America again!
5. You're retarded.

Same. People love the Maritime law voodoo as if Trump would follow along with such nonsense.

Well it's just a thing a guy said on the internet right above you, without receipts. You still don't know that.

AND he get's his shit stickied here...

From Grok:

Overstated or Speculative Claims

• FISA 702 is the essential "lockbox/key" to unlock the entire NSA database for election data review: This is overstated. Section 702 is one authority among many for collection (others include traditional FISA Title I with warrants, EO 12333, etc.). It is targeted (not bulk vacuuming of all data), focused on foreign targets, and subject to minimization rules, certifications, and FISC (FISA Court) oversight. Collection happens via targeting procedures; 702 isn't the sole "baseline" or prerequisite for all metadata/activity flow capture. Without renewal, other tools and existing certifications would still operate for a time.

• The database contains "all" electronic data surrounding U.S. elections that could granularly prove manipulation: No public evidence supports this as a comprehensive "digital record of elections." Election infrastructure (voting machines, tabulation, voter rolls) is primarily state/local and not routinely funneled into NSA's foreign intel databases. Foreign interference (e.g., disinformation, hacking attempts) is tracked, but domestic election administration data isn't a core NSA mission. Claims of broad "manipulation" evidence sitting there ready to be unlocked echo unproven 2020 election theories and lack declassified confirmation. Snowden/Clapper discussions highlighted over-collection broadly, not election specifics.

I'm not sure about SA, but in the US there was a historical need as the country grew and expanded west. Not sure about Canada or Mexico, though I'd guess Canada's need was similar.

Serious question - what other option is there? I assume this means, a non-national giving birth in the US? Naturalized citizen's kids will still have birthright citizenship, correct?

It says that - but it doesn't provide any evidence or citation that a 'ceremonial ritual spectacle' is any where in Admiralty Law. And I'm not going to give you the grace of saying 'Admiralty' law. Maritime. MARITIME law. Apparently the whole of America is held hostage to super sneaky law of the seas.

The post states:

1. America isn't... something? Never claims what's lacking, but its definitely secreted away in Maritime Law, which is apparently so opaque nobody can see through it except a few 'tards on the net.
2. In order to fix, whatever it is, "the people’s visible [and further down 'EXPLICIT'] endorsement of the transition into America’s New Order' is required.
3. The president holding an MMA fight is the people's EXPLICIT endorsement. Not a vote, not legislation, not a Declaration of Independence. A prize fight. Could it have been a concert? A play? A puppet show? Would a ventriloquist act be the PEOPLE's explicit endorsement?
4. As soon as the hand of the winner is raised, America is America again!
5. You're retarded.

You & u/moinombre can't take a drop out of context and apply SovCit voodoo to it, and draw the. most. tenuous. link to an MMA fight on the White House grounds. Go read the whole thread. https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/7555010.html

This drop is about when the reckoning would come for the thing talked about in the thread to which Q is responding, and then the very crimes he lists - Clinton'/Hussein's illegal FISA and the Mueller investigation. This is not serious research, this is tea-leaf, chicken bone reading nonsense.

Also your retarded SovCit bullshit is not the ‘IT’ being referred to in that drop. Read better. Careful, This comment has fringe on the flag!

Signing an EO is law.

They wouldn't, and GEOTUS definitely would not. He'd laugh tell them to fuck off and move on.

And he wouldn't. He has zero patience for legal Bullshit. I don't know why people follow this line of thought. If any of this was true, POTUS would sign a 3 word EO and be done with it: "Go f**k yourself".

No. It's dumb. Trump doesn't need to do legal voodoo to 'undo' anything. You KNOW he'd be the first person to say 'Go F**K yourself' rather than jump through all of these fake hoops. One stroke of a pen on an EO - IF this were true. This is sov-cit hokum, and none of it - none of it - is true or worth talking about.

If you think POTUS would entertain anything like this, you don't know the man and his disdain for legal bullshit.

It's not. People (sov cits, mostly) treat Admiralty law like witchcraft or voodoo, and this is the biggest heaping pile of hilarious bullshit I've ever read. You throw enough legal-ease at people, and they fall for it every time.

Getting rid of heat in space is very, very hard. It's not an optimal environment.

They are to dummies like Nick Shirley. People loooove him, but man if you listen to any interview over 5 mins with him, he's quite literally retarded. He 'finds' things that fit the narrative but almost always fall apart with a little more than cursory glance. He wakes people up, I guess, but lord is he dumb.

So semantically you may be right, but practically it doesn't matter.

FTR she's not 126. Her birthday is listed at 1/1/1900 which is the epoch standard for all Microsoft Products (excel in this case).

It what manner? It’s underreported?