You suuuuure it's not the "GAW Firehose Indexer" mentioned in the AI agent handoff doc? :)
I haven't looked at the code yet, but is this DDoS'ing the site today?
Nobody likes him. He's as weasely as it gets, but that makes him useful in that he's a p***y enough to be a good boy and roll over and do as he's told by GEOTUS.
I read this (and always have ) as at the time of the post, or for a time after the post, but not into perpetuity. That's NOT justice, and certainly absolutely convoluted and unnecessary post-mortem.
And why do we allow people who are known Communists (for example) to run in the first place?
Because the minute you allow the government to decide who can and cannot be voted for, you've thrown out the whole thing.
That's SCOTUS's entire job.
Weird game of telephone we are getting here.
- Video of Walmart playing - well we can't really tell, but Bubba ain't happy about it - sounds kind of like Bollywood (Indian, non-religous) music
- "Walmart is playing Muslim music"
- "Walmart is broadcasting the muslim call to Prayer" lol
- Folks here believe it immediately?
- This should probably be unstickied.
It got a little tin-foily in the comments to your question so here is some founded patterns:
Surge pricing - If a store uses the e-ink or other changeable price tags on their shelves, they can change the price of certain items based on just general anonymous shopping patterns:
- A spike in the purchase of Frosted Flakes over the last x hours or days
- or time based patterns, say people shop for breakfast foods more in the morning than at night,
Prices can increase or decrease based on those params. It's unlikely a store has cameras to track you to an aisle -> shelf -> product to quickly change the price, and then remember to charge you that price as you are tracked back to the register - there is really no need for all of that. Global heuristic based pricing described above is good enough.
Individual Dynamic pricing - If you use a store's app to purchase for in-store or curbside pickup, the prices in the app might not be the same prices in the store - they could under or overcharge you based on your previous purchase history in the app.
You won't have to dive deep on these practices, any MSM outlet has covered them. Whether Wal-Mart is using these practices, I could not say with authority.
methinks you don't know how expatriation works. You left. You don't pay US taxes. You don't get a vote.
Whoa whoa whoa. That's how it was set up. I'm not a fan of this decision, but you have to realize this is one of the three pillars of check and balances the Founders set up.
I must have missed this particular ret-con.
I haven't seen mention of it on GAW, but the very recent ruling barring folks from suing Monsanto for cancer seems like a kick in the gut.
This lady's entire premise is based on 2 USC Section 9 "or voting machine the use of which has been duly authorized by the State law." and then claims, with ZERO evidence, that modern voting machines don't fit the bill.
The problem is, this section is entirely self-executing. The 'voting machine' could be ANYTHING, literally, anything, and as long as it was authorized by State law (which all machines currently are and always have been), then nothing is 'broken', in premise 2 of her argument. Lady needs to read up on the USC and its relationship to state law, and rhetoric in general.
Secondly, if her premise WERE true, then Trump is not President NOW, or in 2016. This dancing near sov-cit legal voodoo BS.
Deepseek rattled the AI model industry when it was released - why? It was accurate as the other models from Anthro and OpenAi at the time, but more importantly it was trained using thousands and thousands of outdated chips - the one they were sanctioned to use.
Well then it can't be both ways. Either Patel is running and is in charge, and just not providing answers, or he's complicit? Answers would only come from him.
It's Trump's FBI? Why shouldn't we trust it. Serious question.
I'll keep reposting this as others keep falling for this legal voodoo bullshit on this board. Now we have new age resonance nonsense added to pile of nonsense?
We already talked about this this (twice now) week, and it's all very, very retarded.
The theory:
- America isn't... something? Never claims what's lacking, but its definitely secreted away in Maritime Law, which is apparently so opaque nobody can see through it except a few 'tards on the net.
- In order to fix, whatever it is, "the people’s visible [and further down 'EXPLICIT'] endorsement of the transition into America’s New Order' is required.
- The president holding an MMA fight is the people's EXPLICIT endorsement. Not a vote, not legislation, not a Declaration of Independence. A prize fight. Could it have been a concert? A play? A puppet show? Would a ventriloquist act be the PEOPLE's explicit endorsement?
- As soon as the hand of the winner is raised, America is America again!
- You're retarded.
Same. People love the Maritime law voodoo as if Trump would follow along with such nonsense.
Well it's just a thing a guy said on the internet right above you, without receipts. You still don't know that.
AND he get's his shit stickied here...
From Grok:
Overstated or Speculative Claims
-
FISA 702 is the essential "lockbox/key" to unlock the entire NSA database for election data review: This is overstated. Section 702 is one authority among many for collection (others include traditional FISA Title I with warrants, EO 12333, etc.). It is targeted (not bulk vacuuming of all data), focused on foreign targets, and subject to minimization rules, certifications, and FISC (FISA Court) oversight. Collection happens via targeting procedures; 702 isn't the sole "baseline" or prerequisite for all metadata/activity flow capture. Without renewal, other tools and existing certifications would still operate for a time.
-
The database contains "all" electronic data surrounding U.S. elections that could granularly prove manipulation: No public evidence supports this as a comprehensive "digital record of elections." Election infrastructure (voting machines, tabulation, voter rolls) is primarily state/local and not routinely funneled into NSA's foreign intel databases. Foreign interference (e.g., disinformation, hacking attempts) is tracked, but domestic election administration data isn't a core NSA mission. Claims of broad "manipulation" evidence sitting there ready to be unlocked echo unproven 2020 election theories and lack declassified confirmation. Snowden/Clapper discussions highlighted over-collection broadly, not election specifics.
I'm not sure about SA, but in the US there was a historical need as the country grew and expanded west. Not sure about Canada or Mexico, though I'd guess Canada's need was similar.
It's not a rule.