Well, there certainly is a decimal point before any numbers that show the percentage chance. Perkins Coie wouldn’t be there but to protect deep state assets. And burn them if they can’t save them. Same asshats involved in Russia collusion and having an fbi sciff in their office.

She is a fighter. I am just coming around to the idea that you could have the fight of an entire platoon of navy seals and when you are fighting an entrenched enemy who abides by no rules but you must abide by them, you’re hosed.

I don’t think our pols are good at asymmetrical fights. Here we are after yet another stolen election, and relying on the same courts that upheld the last one. And the courts are getting more belligerent by fining people for these suits. And trying to take away licenses of lawyers that bring them. We have no response for this. Nor effective techniques in giving it our best shot.

Finchem’s lawyer was room temperature IQ. Couldn’t answer basic shit the judge asked. Of course you get booted if you do that. Judges don’t do your job for you. They make a decision based on what is presented to them. Here is a good spiel on that: https://www.stu.edu/Portals/law/docs/academics/student-orgs/jcl/volumes/Volume%204/RyanLuke-EssayThePartyPresentationRule.pdf

Apparently all the good lawyers would like to continue practicing law and have bowed out. Something has to be done about that.