What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
Your latest comment to me is saying I miss the point of the discussion.
You are saying big pharma could have created a toxin that can presumably spread you mean and call it a virus right? This is the question right?
My reply again...where is it? This toxin spreading virus ?
I might claim the moon is made from cheese but I would have to produce the evidence ..right? It isn't up to anyone else to prove it isn't..the onus is on the person making the assertion.
Now big pharma says there is a...say. an .Omicron virus...where is it? When asked to produce it they say they haven't got an isolate of it.
This is the original question right?
You get so lost in the woods. The original question was whether Reiner Fuellmich is a liar for not saying "viruses do not exist".
I have tried in every possible way I know how to explain to you that a person who does not say "viruses do not exist" is not lying. I don't have anything further to add.
I would agree if they had never had all the scientific data but fuellmich and his team did. They didn't treat Dr Kauffman Dr Lanka etc very courteously according to them at their meeting with the fuellmich team.
You can't see all the evidence that viruses are just human tissue cells coupled with the fact no one has produced an isolate of any virus and can only produce a computer code of what a virus would look like if there was such a thing and still ignore the evidence .
in my opinion fuellmich is controlled opposition
Here are a few question to you, and pay careful attention.
You claim Fuellmich is a controlled opposition since he does not say "Viruses do not exist", Yes or No?
You claim that "Viruses do not exist" is the only truth. Yes or No?
If you claim "Viruses do not exist" you are making a claim that no one has created an artificial virus in the lab, Yes or No?
Now that you have made you claim that no one has created an artificial virus in the lab, you have to backup this claim of yours. How do you do this?
Note, I am NOT claiming viruses have been created in the lab. I am saying there is a possibility that they have been created in the lab.
Pay careful attention here - I am not making any claims, I am asking you to back up your claim.
If you reply anything beyond backing up your claim to this post, I will consider it a deliberate shill trying to waste our time, even after we gave you enormous benefit of doubt all this time.
Respond to this very carefully.
I think you are looking for an excuse to remove me from GA.
As I have said before you could say the moon is made of green cheese...it is up to you to back up that claim..not for me to find evidence that the moon isn't made of green cheese
. Do you comprehend what I am saying?
I have provided lots of evidence as to why viruses are just human tissue cells and therefore not contagious.
.. a hypothetical question about whether big pharma could produce an artificial virus is just that....a hypothetical question. .. if they had done so where is the evidence so it can be refuted?
As I say you are looking for an excuse to remove me.