Things I wish Olsen and Blehm would have pursued and argued more aggressively:

1. The fact that a large percentage of voters waited until election day is direct evidence of distrust in the current system. The public suspects the MC system is fraudulent and a re-do under a special master with strict rules would help settle this and rebuild trust (find legal precedents). Defense should have no problem with a re-do since Hobbs presumably won by a comfortable margin. Carefully but firmly show the vital importance of this case.

2. 1/3 - 2/3 of centers misprinting 19" images on 20" paper is probabilistically way beyond anything that could have happened accidentally, meaning somebody intentionally made the changes. Were the printers or the ballot image laptops connected to the internet the night before election day? How easily could they have been manipulated? + follow up questions to try and discover the culprit(s).

3. Right at the end of his testimony yesterday, Richer categorically denied being involved in any PAC against Lake. Cannot this be shown fairly easily and then bring him up for perjury and totally discredit him and his team?

4. Jarrett says they are still conducting a root cause analysis and admitted shrink-to-fit at 3 centers. Ask how many man-hours are being devoted to this each day and why is it taking so long? Build a case for a slow walk cover up.

5. Diminish perceived strength of bipartisan reviewers in the chain of custody by mentioning the Republican party has clear splits over candidates like Lake and Trump, especially in Arizona. How are the bipartisan reviewers selected?

6. Obtain a spreadsheet of numbers from each voting center, including precise totals of the number of voters who showed up each day (especially election day), number of ballots printed, exact counts from each tabulator, drawer 3, spoiled ballots, provisional ballots, dropped off early ballots, etc. When a tabulator fails to read a ballot, is that counted somehow? Is the lifetime total counter incremented? Obtain all data from each tabulator memory card. Has chain of custody on these memory cards been maintained? Contact all voting location supervisors to verify the numbers. Examine all numbers carefully and drill down on discrepancies. How many and what percentages were ultimately adjudicated from each category of ballot?

7. Show a well-constructed and easily visible geographical heatmap map of all vote centers overlayed with proportion of registered Republican voters. Somebody (Baris?) reported seeing such a map in MC headquarters--obtain it as evidence and ask pointed questions.

8. Create a visual aid of each of the chains of custody and highlight every link that is questionable, especially chains that involves Runbeck. Are the packets or ballots in the "vault" under 24/7 bipartisan surveillance? In which places are "seals" easily broken and replaced?

9. Richard Baris' rambling and talkative style appeared to flummox the defense. But be ready in closing to very clearly state and support his estimated range of disenfranchised voters.

10. In the hearing on Monday, make absolutely sure laches is not applied to signature verification (Count 3) by claiming the defendants did not follow the existing procedure as per testimony of the level 1 witnesses.

11. Also on Monday, tie the First Amendment and Twitter evidence to Hobbs' duty to run a "free and fair" election in her role as Secretary of State, and really hammer home the apparent impropriety of her running her own election.