So i've watched every McCullough, Korry, Cole, Malone, etc... interview and podcast. All of them say that the problem with the vaccine is that the vaccine is replicating the wrong part of the virus, the spike protein, which is causing all the blood clots. I understand all of that, but i believe McCullough and some others still say that its ok for people over 65. If the problem with the spike is that it causes the blood clots, why would it be safe for people over 65? As you get older your body’s ability to create plasmin (the natural enzyme that breaks down blood clots) diminishes, while the ability and rate of creating clots increases. For a very long time, this idea of over 65 confused me. The only thing i can think of is hormones. Older people do not have hormones, like testosterone, like the young and healthy.. but older people still have a harder time creating plasmin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
"but i believe McCullough and some others still say that its ok for people over 65", have you tried to confirm if that is true or not?
The number 65 is arbitrary in the larger context of this, and is just a "chosen" number by entities in power dealing with old people.
It is for example also linked to an age that goes with other programs determined by age, for example Adult Day Service Centers (ADSCs), which is for those aged 65 and above.
The pharma and medical industry often has these three categories in regard to adults: 19 through 26, 27 through 64 and 65 and above.
That age number has been displayed all over the place, HHS, CDC, NHS, etc., are you sure it it was "McCullough and some others" (which is also really vague)?
Yes, I've literally heard McCullough say it many times.. in interviews. Not in presentations, but layed back interviews.