So i've watched every McCullough, Korry, Cole, Malone, etc... interview and podcast. All of them say that the problem with the vaccine is that the vaccine is replicating the wrong part of the virus, the spike protein, which is causing all the blood clots. I understand all of that, but i believe McCullough and some others still say that its ok for people over 65. If the problem with the spike is that it causes the blood clots, why would it be safe for people over 65? As you get older your body’s ability to create plasmin (the natural enzyme that breaks down blood clots) diminishes, while the ability and rate of creating clots increases. For a very long time, this idea of over 65 confused me. The only thing i can think of is hormones. Older people do not have hormones, like testosterone, like the young and healthy.. but older people still have a harder time creating plasmin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Those comments about the 65 y/o age group by Dr McCullough and others.
As previous anons have mentioned, it's an arbitrary example. Those Doctors also mention treatment of patients, who are not Vaccinated, with the safe, effective early treatments and recommend that nobody should get Vaccinated if they choose not to.
They also mention often that if people have to be Vaccinated because of pressure from employers, that these people should way up the risk benifits ratio. They would see the risks far outweigh any possible benifits.
Those Doctors recommend people should decide if it is possible to seek different employment to avoid being Vaccinated.
It can leave people in a very difficult situation,but they have to realise they may need to make uncomfortable decisions to stay unvaccinated.