If the mainstream media were honest, this would get major coverage.
Isn't it interesting that this is never covered. Also interesting is the timing this info was released. If I remember correctly, it was right after they decided to unleash the first variant, omicron.
To me it's clear. They initiated the go signal for releasing variants every 6 months, and the response was, "Okay, this vaccine kills em all"
This opinion purposely ignores the implications that there is no virus and only discussed the current narratives
I wouldn't take anything, regardless. It's the dissemination of info I'm interested in.
And this is the war for the public mind. In my opinion, these are moves and counter moves to sway the popular sentiment.
Imo it's extremely illogical that Q would say that civil war must be avoided to save lives...but at the same time we're supposed to swallow that it's ok for them to inject our military with a known slow-acting poison.
A} I don't think there will be forced inoculation. It will be completely optional as Trump has always stated it should be.
B} it's actually going through lengthy human trials now, the way it's always supposed to be. Which the current crop never did. {Whether we agree we need vaccines or not is a moot point for this argument}
Also, I merely speaking in terms of public perception.
Most of this fight is about...? Changing the narrative/force closing on MSM narrative.
I find out very curious it's never being reported on. If it were a plan to further the same claptrap shots out there now, it would be being pushed to the forefront