https://awakecanada.org/the-ethical-implications-of-ai-navigating-the-future-together/ The Ethical Implications of AI: Navigating the Future Together - Awake Canada
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Pluto is one that couldn't be seen without a telescope.
IMO, when they talk of "gods" is better taken as alien, where God is more in line with the creator.
Beyond that any response would get convoluted and lengthy.
This tingles the brain, though I did take the aluminum bowl off.
Personally I would rather not give them "gods" at all. Creator specifies Maker of. Dolls or puppets, they would not exist without purpose.
I had something made years ago, burned it last night. I can make something today, burn it today. Creator is biggest.
So i agree with you but wouldn't call them that. If we have the same maker would it matter where we were found? We are supposed to be the aliens.
Angels, aliens, really the term isn't that important, so long as the distinction is made from God.
I mean, the Mahabarata talks about a war with "gods" that describes things that we could accept as rockets, nuclear weapons, UFOs, laser weapons, and one weapon that would have destroyed the whole planet (it misses).
Or the ancient Greek and Roman myths where there were the demigods that fought alongside men...
I don't believe those are accounts of divine beings, but could relatively accept them as aliens using technologies.
How feel you about Jesus?
I was raised catholic, and in spite of a period where I left the church, have come to realize that Christian beliefs are most likely true and real. (When it comes to old testament, I tend to think that where the books tend towards reference of individuals, that the stories make more sense if thinking in terms of groups or tribes)
External to that, I'm aware of non-christian sources that describe Jesus as a factual individual who was factually crucified as a traitor.