If he did, wouldn’t there be tweets provning he did. Scott is difficult to understand if your mindset is binary. He is often holding more than one position in questions that is not yet proven to one way or the other.
I don’t if you are small-brained, but you can’t read Adams without using your brain, he is challenging and his writing obviously goes way over some peoples heads.
Folks are constantly taking his writing one step further, sometimes several steps further, than what he actually said.
There is no difference in this to what leftists do when they take our opinions and somehow come to the conclusion that we are racists. We never said anything racist, but they are sure we did, because they know what we meant. Mindreaders.
If he did, wouldn’t there be tweets provning he did. Scott is difficult to understand if your mindset is binary. He is often holding more than one position in questions that is not yet proven to one way or the other.
"Scott is difficult to understand if your mindset is binary."
Translation: If you point out the obvious hypocrisy in his posts then you're too small-brained to understand his enlightened stances.
I don’t if you are small-brained, but you can’t read Adams without using your brain, he is challenging and his writing obviously goes way over some peoples heads.
Folks are constantly taking his writing one step further, sometimes several steps further, than what he actually said.
There is no difference in this to what leftists do when they take our opinions and somehow come to the conclusion that we are racists. We never said anything racist, but they are sure we did, because they know what we meant. Mindreaders.
Cope. His posts represent him being a flip-flopping egotistical douche.
His responses to folks on the thread reveal that he is a d-bag.