In many ways, the British, who had been arming themselves for over five years jumped into a war against Germany when they really should have joined them against Poland, who, in a blind hatred, were the ones killing innocent civilians, and conducting raids over the border to do the same. But, Churchill was very persuasive on that radio. He was a war historian, but I believe he had a blind spot against Germans, possibly due to WW1.
It is weird how parallels can be drawn currently. The Ukrainians were committing genocide against Ukrainian Russian speakers, but yet Russia is the bad guy, according to the blinded, propagandized West.
I agree with @Strelnieks, that we need to keep an eye on the Poles, although I am on the fence about this. Ukraine was a patchwork created in a time when it was a theory that making a nation of different ethnicities was a path to world peace. A piece of Poland was carved off by the Soviets, including the beloved Polish city Lvov.
Perhaps it would be a good thing for Poland to reclaim those lands. The question is: at what costs? Perhaps they would do that when Ukraine was already on its knees, and they would in effect rescue the Western Ukraine from a fate of poverty. Would the Poles meet Russian opposition, because the Poles would be seen as NATO forces? I don't know.
Chamberlain met w AH apparently FIVE times and could find no reason for war. He was replaced by (((Winston Churchill))), supported by a group of banksters headed by (((Bernard Baruch))) and an interest group called "FOCUS." WC's debts were taken care of and he was allowed to continue drinking alcoholically, gambling recklessly and all he had to do was one thing:
In many ways, the British, who had been arming themselves for over five years jumped into a war against Germany when they really should have joined them against Poland, who, in a blind hatred, were the ones killing innocent civilians, and conducting raids over the border to do the same. But, Churchill was very persuasive on that radio. He was a war historian, but I believe he had a blind spot against Germans, possibly due to WW1.
It is weird how parallels can be drawn currently. The Ukrainians were committing genocide against Ukrainian Russian speakers, but yet Russia is the bad guy, according to the blinded, propagandized West.
I agree with @Strelnieks, that we need to keep an eye on the Poles, although I am on the fence about this. Ukraine was a patchwork created in a time when it was a theory that making a nation of different ethnicities was a path to world peace. A piece of Poland was carved off by the Soviets, including the beloved Polish city Lvov.
Perhaps it would be a good thing for Poland to reclaim those lands. The question is: at what costs? Perhaps they would do that when Ukraine was already on its knees, and they would in effect rescue the Western Ukraine from a fate of poverty. Would the Poles meet Russian opposition, because the Poles would be seen as NATO forces? I don't know.
Chamberlain met w AH apparently FIVE times and could find no reason for war. He was replaced by (((Winston Churchill))), supported by a group of banksters headed by (((Bernard Baruch))) and an interest group called "FOCUS." WC's debts were taken care of and he was allowed to continue drinking alcoholically, gambling recklessly and all he had to do was one thing: