Anons have been well trained over the years not to react to dates or what seems like important events/markers. At the same time, it is always exciting to look forward to something big that seems possible. For Brunson Case, the one thing that stands out for me is the 1/6 conference date. If SCOTUS had to dismiss it, they could have kept it for conference on 12/2 or 12/9 and be over it without creating this noise. Let's see what happens!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Considering the ramifications of this case, i.e. decapitating the administrative branch and effectively dissolving the legislative branch, I doubt that even Justice Thomas has the courage to follow through regardless of the evidence.
Yes that is most likely. But, if this case has merits and house cleaning is to be done as per plan, then this is a better solution than using the military to avoid any civil unrest!
That would be great. However, once the DS realizes "the jig is up" and they are going down, they will employ the Sampson Option and activate their private armies. BLM, ANTIFA, not to mention the hundreds of thousands who have infiltrated across the open borders. The additional threat is the Islamic sleeper cells who may be activated if their leaders see an opportunity to destabilize or take over the US.
Realistically though, I think at best this case may be just another in a deluge of red pills that Normies seem unable to swallow.
IMO, action by SCOTUS in Brunson case or any such significant action cannot be done without support of Military, either directly or indirectly acting in the background. But yes, this case, like many other events in the past, may also turn out to be of litile significance and dismissed by SCOTUS.